On TechRepublic: 10 lame phrases to cut from your resume
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 30 of 45:
Next »
« Previous
Slander
I'm not sure how it works in the USA, but here in Australia open or publicly stating lies that in any way defame someone's reputation, then one can sue for damages. If someone (no names) says publicly that PJ is paid to say what she says (the truth of course) then unless she equally publicly defends her integrity with a law suit, rumours will abound.

If certain persons were sued for say $100,000, then that could go towards funding Groklaw.

Wouldn't that be ironic? I can see the headlines: SCO funds Groklaw!

Note, SCO is here an acronym for Sorry Company Obituary, and any similarities with any company living or dead (or dying) is purely coincidental.

All I know is, I would!!

Cheers
Posted by: etmax   Posted on: 03/05/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Nice one  regwells | 03/05/04
SCO fears the truth  issthatso | 03/05/04
Once again SCO makes an untrue statement.  Arrg | 03/05/04
I see the flaw in your argument...  phorvath2110 | 03/05/04
Re: Once again SCO makes an untrue statement  MG_z | 03/05/04
LOL I have to come clean  Arrg | 03/05/04
Of the lawyers, by the lawyers, for the lawyers  Robert Hahn | 03/05/04
All steal  kalle2 | 03/06/04
So what if there was?  vdraken | 03/05/04
Groklaw is Invaluable  amywohl | 03/05/04
who are the sponsors?  dg mh | 03/05/04
It's quite clear.  Yen_z | 03/05/04
Talk about thick headed...  Jose Jimenez | 03/05/04
Good question  jerryg_z | 03/05/04
Perfect...if  rjamestaylor | 03/06/04
Oh really? Then who's your sponsor?  Zogg | 03/05/04
RTFA, dg mh.  Damon K | 03/08/04
IBM equipment to lbiblio  MG_z | 03/05/04
PJ's Letter  The_Flatlander | 03/05/04
And who's sponsering SCO? Turns out it's MSFT  Dan__ | 03/05/04
thx ZD dot NET...  Arm A. Geddon | 03/05/04
We need PJ in politics  Chad_z | 03/05/04
Money trail  jcbick | 03/08/04
"we're crooks and liars, so they must be too!"  ryusen | 03/05/04
Class  kburt@... | 03/05/04
SCO hasn't told the truth in months  bill_the_catz@... | 03/05/04
More feet won't help them...  DaveLozier | 03/05/04
I know who supports Groklaw...  rayh_z | 03/05/04
Re National Treasure  etmax | 03/05/04
Slander  etmax | 03/05/04
maybe Darl could room with Martha in the big house  fishyfool | 03/05/04
Home decoration  kalle2 | 03/06/04
Groklaw - a tool against the NEW CORPORATE FASCISM of SCO  erichbfriesen | 03/05/04
SCO deceit exposed again  rjamestaylor | 03/06/04
Is there a decent laywer in the room?  NemesisNL | 03/06/04
I am challenging laywers in the USA to respond to this  Stellie | 04/17/07
Integrity  troutmaskreplica | 03/06/04
Nice Balance ZDNET  BanjoPaterson | 03/06/04
Thank you ZDNet  completelyot | 03/06/04
An honorable person . . .  a_dreamer | 03/06/04
"an honorable person"...  waltH | 03/08/04
Don't worry too much... it's just pure FUD  jeansagi | 03/08/04
SCO claims IBM supports truth!!  waltH | 03/08/04
Was one of Darl's ancestors a member of the Molly McGuires?  boomslang_z | 03/08/04
Can SCO be sued?  idarmadi@... | 03/09/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here