Old solar tech back in limelight

TalkBack 7 of 23:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Ummmm yes!

"Yes. I said environmentally harmful, or do you think it's more environmentally friendly to pave over the entire Southwestern U.S. with solar cells rather than build a thousand Nuclear reactors?"

The waste that those 1,000 reactors would produce would create another more dangerous problem! Radioactive bi-products that would pose SERIOUS health threats to every living creature on the planet!

Again there are places around the world that are devoid of any significant life, complete death zones that could be utilized and not have the impact that radioactive waste WOULD have. What is your proposition for disposal of said waste? Or did you fail to realize that they are already having issues with waste leaking into water systems and the soils, thereby rendering once safe to live for everything a death trap?

[url=http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/factsheets/doeymp0017.shtml]All of their options[/url] have significant drawbacks.

[url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4407421.stm]And the UK[/url] is having problems as well trying to resolve the waste disposal problems.

So your solution is not acceptable. The risks are too great and the dangers exceed acceptability.

Posted by: Linux User 147560   Posted on: 05/05/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
• The Impact of Virtualization Software on Operating Environments VMware Today's use of virtualization technology allows IT professionals to ... Download Now
• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now