On CBS.com: Play Survivor Video Trivia Now
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 31 of 39:
Next »
« Previous
Welcome to the Open Standards Formation Procedures
`` However, Jason Matusow, Microsoft director of standards affairs, said in a statement: "The ODF format is limited to the features and performance of OpenOffice and StarOffice and would not satisfy most of our Microsoft Office customers today."

In the open standards forum (IEEE, ISO, IEC, ANSI, etc.) participating organizations and individuals who are expert on that particular field, get together and they fashion a standard that makes sense for all the participating parties in terms of technical feasibility, performance and even financial impact. Has anyone showed up from Redmond to PARITICPATE in the process? Have they reaised objections or made any suggestions to improve it? I do not think so.


``The process to move the standard to publication may come quickly, said a representative for the American Standards Institute, which represents the United States to the ISO. The spokesman noted that in similar situations, his organization has seen the process take from weeks to several months for a standard to be published. ''

After the standard is ratified (or close to it) whoever wants to support it can start working on conformant applications. MS is free to support it or not.

A large issue such as the format of open documents is expected to impact document processing in the long term and for large numbers of organizations and individuals. Why MS did NOT want to contribute and make the standard include their own parts that are more suited or fitting MSO?


This is hoe things work: people get together and DEBATE with each other based on technical, financial and othe issues. The final product may not be perfect (as nothing is) but at least it is as close as it can get to allow MULTIPLE VENDORS start supporting it so that the documents can FREELY flow among apps from different vendors. Then vendor products are selected based on the favorable Functionality/Cost ratio.

With the backwards and "me-grab-all" mentality MS cannot thrive in this environment. They can only rely on forcing their desktop users to also buy their server products and not let other vendors
Posted by: michael_t   Posted on: 05/03/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

LOL, they published it in PDF, a real standard.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/03/06
Since you asked  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/03/06
Sounds like a good excuse.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/03/06
Are you working with DRAMs? nt  michael_t | 05/03/06
Aren't we all?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/03/06
yes: Jedec (nt)  michael_t | 05/03/06
*sigh*  zkiwi | 05/03/06
C&C  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/03/06
You guys quit pickin' on Axey!  OButterball | 05/03/06
Man there is a picture I Didn't need  OldMarine | 05/04/06
Anyway you cut it, they don't use ODF.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/03/06
Vas you dere, Sharley?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/03/06
Then why on earth  zkiwi | 05/03/06
ODF like .doc, isn't the right standard here, it is for editible documents.  DonnieBoy | 05/04/06
Yeah Donnie  Hrothgar - PCLinuxOS User | 05/04/06
PDF is for non-editable documents to maintain exact printing.  DonnieBoy | 05/03/06
Congrats Donnieboy!  George Mitchell | 05/04/06
No Ax, put your money where your mouth is....  tic swayback | 05/04/06
"Microsoft said it will support interoperability with OpenDocument"  Tony Agudo | 05/03/06
Neither.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/03/06
The statement came directly from the article...  Tony Agudo | 05/03/06
They will support ODF through 3rd party filters, so they say.  DonnieBoy | 05/03/06
ODF plugin  JDThompson | 05/04/06
Careful JD  OldMarine | 05/04/06
Thanks, JD!  Tony Agudo | 05/04/06
Still waiting  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/03/06
Just a WAG but I would say...  Confused by religion | 05/03/06
Could you be a bit more specific?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/03/06
Few are going to actually work in odf format  zmud | 05/04/06
If enough use ODF as the format to exchange documents, might as well bypass  DonnieBoy | 05/04/06
Welcome to the Open Standards Formation Procedures  michael_t | 05/03/06
If I remember correctly...  rapson | 05/04/06
Memory check failure  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/04/06
Thanks for the correction  rapson | 05/04/06
Breaking the lock.....  linux_for_me | 05/03/06
goverment should force M$ to support  toxicfreak | 05/04/06
Its taken care of already ...  George Mitchell | 05/04/06
Apparently the folks in the ISO committees did not read  michael_t | 05/04/06
At least they can read  rcasha_z | 05/05/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here