On mySimon: Ultimate Box Sets!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 38:
Next »
« Previous
Witch hunt
Either this is such a farce, or someone messed up the facts in this. IAC tried to undelete files to find incriminating evidence against a former employee. They didn't find any, so they use the lack of evidence as the incriminating evidence. I'm sure they'd find something to sue him over even if he didn't delete anything and became a farmer with a farm within 150 miles of an airport. It almost sounds frivolous.

Another thing to point out besides IAC's lack of requiring backups is the company's complete lack of security. While the article mentioned OSX's secure trash bin, it never mentioned what the employee actually used for a laptop and OS. It could very well have been Windows or Linux distro. No matter what OS it was, IAC should have locked down the OS so that the employee didn't have the permission to install software that wasn't there when the laptop was given to him. If he needed something that wasn't there, he would have to go through the requsition chain and have IAC's IT guy install it like any other company. While he may be guilty of wiping the data, the fact that he was able to do it because of a lax IT policy should be given some consideration.
Posted by: jheine   Posted on: 03/10/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

LOL! I love the targeted ads for deletion programs on this page  ejhonda | 03/10/06
Sounds like sour grapes to me.  shawkins | 03/10/06
not to mention  Monkey_MCSE | 03/10/06
The Laptop is owned by IAC  voska | 03/10/06
Witch hunt  jheine | 03/10/06
He should counter-sue for breach of contract.  el1jones | 03/11/06
Well, actually he CAN'T delete  John Zern | 03/12/06
Deleted files are not meant to be recovered.  johnsmith222 | 03/10/06
Exactly  mobrien_12@... | 03/10/06
RE  triangle | 03/21/06
Stupid opinon  jjerry | 03/10/06
This is Posner, remember?  JJ Brannon | 03/13/06
Wups!  JJ Brannon | 03/13/06
Intent and ownership are key issues.  awflint | 03/10/06
Read more closely.  Anton Philidor | 03/10/06
Thanks Anton  OldMarine | 03/12/06
Self incrimination...  jasonp@... | 03/13/06
Remember this decision...  Anton Philidor | 03/10/06
Another reason to run your own business  Chad_z | 03/10/06
The country can't lose  Shelendrea | 03/13/06
The US Constitution is screwed, Presumption of Innocence is also screwed...  Vily Clay | 03/10/06
what??  ipfresh@... | 03/12/06
Idiots in robes ....  An_Axe_to_Grind | 03/12/06
I'm surprised  DarthRidiculous | 03/13/06
So it WOULD have been better  Roger Ramjet | 03/13/06
It would have been  mrlinux | 03/13/06
Ruling conflicts w/ gov. regs. requiring securing data.  JonathonDoe | 03/13/06
Talk about putting the cart before the horse!!!  bnjsatx | 03/13/06
Police Blotter  checkmate101 | 03/13/06
Returning equipment  dmhunter@... | 03/14/06
There is another key assumption made that isn't addressed  bladehawke | 04/07/06
reality check  Dageezer | 03/13/06
So...the laptop was networked at the time of the alleged "crime"? If not..  Ol'Dewd | 03/14/06
The law mentioned doesn't refer to networked computer specifically  Ol'Dewd | 03/14/06
Brilliant!!!  emetib | 03/20/06
am i the only one?  abner_mality | 03/27/06
maybe he just defragged!  baldwinleo@... | 05/09/06
Creating a Climate of Fear  mighetto | 08/21/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here