On TV.com: 5 SCARIEST Episodes in TV History
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 147:
Next »
« Previous
But will you catch on?
>>I have been saying all along that Google is "hiding" behind the privacy issue to protect their trade secrets.<<

So, trade secrets are only important when they are MICROSOFT'S!!! They are the only ones who don't have to comply with the courts.

You are unintentionally extremely funny.
Posted by: Still Lynn   Posted on: 02/17/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Privacy matters when trade secrets are at risk  george_ou | 02/17/06
My gawd, someone else finally caught on.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/17/06
And that's bad?  jflash_z | 02/17/06
No surprise from George or Axe  OhMyGosh | 02/17/06
But will you catch on?  Still Lynn | 02/17/06
Will you?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/18/06
I imagine you feel all companies think like that  JasonL31 | 02/20/06
Just because "do no evil" helps them  AzuMao | 03/17/09
Do No Evil  nomorems | 02/18/06
privacy != censorship  StanB | 02/17/06
That's the point...  techboy_z | 02/17/06
Hmmm...  nomorems | 02/18/06
The point is, Chinese law is different then U.S.A. law  AzuMao | 03/17/09
NO, they are fighting US compliance.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/17/06
Fighting is compliant  Erik1234 | 02/17/06
Exactly  StanB | 02/17/06
Your preaching to the Choir...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/17/06
Yes and...  StanB | 02/17/06
You haven't been watching the news for a while then?  Still Lynn | 02/17/06
Not according to GW  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/18/06
... this is a republic --EXCEPT ...  lalogos | 02/21/06
What does Privacy have with China?  nucrash | 02/17/06
You are kidding, Right?  osreinstall | 02/17/06
They do,,, but..  nucrash | 02/17/06
There are no buts Bubba.  osreinstall | 02/17/06
Do No Evil  nomorems | 02/18/06
Who cares.  osreinstall | 02/18/06
No, you are  AzuMao | 03/17/09
Censorship is NOT invasion of privacy ???  lalogos | 02/21/06
Problem is not Google  aetherjoy | 02/17/06
You're half right, George.  bhartman36 | 02/19/06
re : Privacy matters when trade secrets are at risk  JasonL31 | 02/20/06
Cynical cheap shot  Fred Fredrickson | 02/21/06
Why all the heel dragging Google?  osreinstall | 02/17/06
No, the records become part of the public record.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/17/06
I was referring to actual trade secrets, not BS reasons.  osreinstall | 02/17/06
Lost and dreaming  Cayble | 02/17/06
Comply with the court order. Because they will come and take it anyway.  osreinstall | 02/17/06
If I can have your results...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/17/06
Yeah....  nomorems | 02/18/06
Sure guy.  osreinstall | 02/18/06
I am sure the results can be published.  osreinstall | 02/17/06
Refering to actual trade secrets  lobo1953 | 02/17/06
Keep your fantasies to yourself.  osreinstall | 02/17/06
Privacy and Free Rights are not BS reasons.  Narg | 02/17/06
Google's are BS reasons.  osreinstall | 02/17/06
The Slippery Slope Fallacy  bhartman36 | 02/20/06
re: The Slippery Slope Fallacy  JasonL31 | 02/20/06
"Broader Ones"  bhartman36 | 02/20/06
Ummmm....  nomorems | 02/18/06
Do No Evil  nomorems | 02/18/06
Google is protecting Google's privacy, not ours.  osreinstall | 02/18/06
It would show how much revenue comes from porn  John Zern | 02/17/06
Drop in Stock Price?  Erik1234 | 02/17/06
Stock price / market capitalization  John Zern | 02/19/06
Interesting conjecture . . .  NeverLift | 02/17/06
No arroganamce...  nomorems | 02/18/06
the subject at hand  rlambert@... | 02/21/06
No  jflash_z | 02/17/06
"Google said"  John Zern | 02/19/06
Speaking for yourself...  IT_User | 02/18/06
Good comeback. Did I hurt someone's feelings?  John Zern | 02/19/06
hypocracy at its best  Shelendrea | 02/17/06
Idiotic  kenruppel | 02/17/06
OT: Idiotic People  Erik1234 | 02/17/06
Good point  Cayble | 02/17/06
The joke is ...  Still Lynn | 02/17/06
Not A Women...  nomorems | 02/18/06
K..  nomorems | 02/18/06
Once again..........................  glstorck@... | 02/17/06
You are an idiot. It's people as idiotic ..........  glstorck@... | 02/17/06
Hippothetical Miss Steak?  Still Lynn | 02/17/06
obfuscatory....  nomorems | 02/18/06
Even if she had said "hypocrisy"  AzuMao | 03/17/09
IMHO...  Kaylara | 02/17/06
Governments already supports religion  cubbage@... | 02/17/06
How unfair  zzz1234567890 | 02/17/06
What code?  StanB | 02/17/06
here a memory refresher  zzz1234567890 | 02/17/06
there a recovered memory through hipgnosis  Still Lynn | 02/17/06
No...  nomorems | 02/18/06
Bing , bing , bing , bing , bing , bing , bing  I'm Ye, the MS SHILL . | 02/18/06
Coke Pepsi  zzz1234567890 | 02/17/06
Monopole??  lobo1953 | 02/17/06
Put down the pipe!  Still Lynn | 02/17/06
Lynn, Lynn...  dsentman@... | 02/18/06
Then  Shelendrea | 02/20/06
"She"  AzuMao | 03/17/09
Ummmm....  nomorems | 02/18/06
Monopoly? Where??  twhiting9275 | 02/18/06
re: Coke Pepsi  JasonL31 | 02/20/06
Too thick for the clue stick to affect?  Still Lynn | 02/17/06
Common People... Stop comparing this to China  thedunlap | 02/17/06
Exactly  mashama@... | 02/17/06
You don't understand me.  CobraA1 | 02/17/06
IYOP...  StanB | 02/17/06
re: IYOP  CobraA1 | 02/18/06
Not humble enough though  Still Lynn | 02/17/06
It sure does  CobraA1 | 02/18/06
uhhem...  nomorems | 02/18/06
YUP...  nomorems | 02/18/06
None of the Government's business!  Goofydad | 02/17/06
Scared...  preacherx | 02/17/06
Do us all a favour, go back to sleep  Cayble | 02/17/06
Night night  preacherx | 02/17/06
oooooooooooooooh!  nomorems | 02/18/06
Precisely  jflash_z | 02/17/06
Save us from ourselves?  HypnoToad | 02/17/06
Agree 100%  EBathory | 02/18/06
You are fooling no one!  johnsmith222 | 02/17/06
Ummmm....  nomorems | 02/18/06
google wifi = mtn view, san francisco and now boston  kimo@... | 02/17/06
Yeah, well....  nomorems | 02/18/06
Republicans: It's all about the businessman.  Anthony S. | 02/17/06
huh?  preacherx | 02/17/06
If you hate money and love the poor...  StanB | 02/17/06
Don't forget where the Gore family got their money...  John Zern | 02/19/06
And all the Democrats are God's little angels then?  HypnoToad | 02/17/06
Well...  nomorems | 02/18/06
Yes, They do  John Zern | 02/18/06
Typical politicians  jflash_z | 02/17/06
Congratulations!  StanB | 02/17/06
WHy is anybody dealing with China?  HypnoToad | 02/17/06
Go Microsoft !!!  nomorems | 02/18/06
Because  jflash_z | 02/20/06
Earth to Toad  AzuMao | 03/17/09
Riddle me this  LinuxHippie | 02/17/06
Government already supports religion  cubbage@... | 02/17/06
In the Constitution  petteyg359 | 02/17/06
Careful now  rapson | 02/20/06
My examples  petteyg359 | 02/20/06
Easy  AzuMao | 03/17/09
Imagine...  StanB | 02/17/06
Just to make you happy...  petteyg359 | 02/17/06
BOTH!  AzuMao | 03/17/09
Actually, this is a 4th Amendment Issue....  guitar_samuri | 02/18/06
Only idiots think Google is wrong  JonathanSeer | 02/18/06
Come on johnnyindetox...  John Zern | 02/18/06
Wrong  AzuMao | 03/17/09
Half-right  bhartman36 | 02/21/06
So what?  AzuMao | 03/17/09
The future in 2020?  agent_of_love | 02/19/06
I must be missing something...  James T. Kirk | 02/20/06
well...  belkorin | 02/20/06
To the contrary  James T. Kirk | 02/21/06
Google is Wrong  psych0fred | 02/23/07
Uh-huh  AzuMao | 03/17/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More