On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 19 of 22:
Next »
« Previous
It still will not work no matter how much lipstick you put on the pig.
Oh that is a good one. You know what, the gov't does make it worse. It is called a track record. You really are a dingbat!

It pretty much is dead I didn't ignore you. I just said you are wrong and gave a reason. You have reading and comprehension problems. Either that or you watch Abbott & Costello all the time.

Nope. If they want a guarentee of QoS, get out the checkbook. I am not going to stand by and have my network degraded to accomodate these guys so they get a better deal. Pay as you go and pay for what you use.

I believe they do this already. I do not want a law guarenteeing equality. No two services are equal anyway. Net neutrality guarentees that the people that conserve will pay a higher cost per packet than the bandwidth hogs. This isn't right.

I don't bother with P2P anymore. Yes they could if you were bogging down their network or they would just block you. If you were using 50-100 gigabytes per day, they would say something to your provider that would say something to you. The problem with net neutrality is the bandwidth hogs get rewarded. Pay as you go.

Net neutrality is a argument on fairness to the competition. If 60% of the packets on my provider belongs to a Google service, I want them to pay for it. Net neutrality gives the big guys a free ride. Nothing is fair about that. They are benefitting from all the ISP pipes.

The FCC? The porn crusaders on private networks? Now I know it will not work. No seriously the network is out of their juristiction. They govern public airwaves. I got a better idea. Send these 3rd party providers a bill for guarenteed services. Since VoIP requires 911 services, they will need QoS services.

Damn Gumnit stay out of technical problems.
Posted by: osreinstall   Posted on: 02/08/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I have a problem with this  rapson | 02/07/06
Actually..  Jeff Spicoli | 02/07/06
a few concerns here - possibly due to the wording used by the story ...  ac2_z | 02/07/06
This is such BS, I need to run for Congress.  Suicida| | 02/07/06
Net neutrality and other potholes to utopia.  osreinstall | 02/07/06
Good base concept, poorly written  ac2_z | 02/07/06
More like not enough written.  osreinstall | 02/07/06
bwu-huh? Focus on one thought next time  ac2_z | 02/08/06
You are another one that your terms of fairness wouldn't be to others.  osreinstall | 02/08/06
Ah, now I see ... you didn't read the story.  ac2_z | 02/08/06
You have reading problems  osreinstall | 02/08/06
You're adding non-issues. Stay on the subject.  ac2_z | 02/08/06
Not really  osreinstall | 02/08/06
You're drifting off subject again.  ac2_z | 02/08/06
Not really. You need to consider factors that were not mentioned.  osreinstall | 02/08/06
And I thought you were starting to make progress ...  ac2_z | 02/08/06
It isn't going to work.  osreinstall | 02/08/06
Actually, I did. You ignore it.  ac2_z | 02/08/06
It still will not work no matter how much lipstick you put on the pig.  osreinstall | 02/08/06
Tap Tap  osreinstall | 02/08/06
Getting it from both ends...  ZzSmirKzZ | 02/08/06
Everyone is a customer of pipe providers.  osreinstall | 02/08/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More