On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 43 of 84:
Next »
« Previous
Right target: software patents in general
----------
Sorry, but the anti-patent retaliation clause will not hit the real problem causers, because the worst patent pirates are firms of lawyers who buy up old patents and then sue with them. They never develop anything themselves, so the proposed sanction has no teeth.
----------

This is an excellent point, but the GPL's terms are, probably, the best they can do with the laws that exist. Moreover, there is the potential for FOSS to become pervasive enough to make even the patent sharks pause before filing lawsuits - at least long enough to make sure they don't use *any* FOSS at all.

----------
However, a company may have a legitimate patent on technology that was never meant to be put into OSS. This rule says they have to give it up to a pirate who grabbed it and slapped GPL on it, or cancel any GPL development they may be doing.
----------

This begs the question on whether or not there *is* such a thing as a "legitimate" software patent! (;>) Moreover, the statement includes a built-in assumption that anybody using somebody else's software patent is a "pirate," which I also contest. Nevertheless ...

Remember, the patent retaliation clause is *optional.* Not all GPL3 software will contain it. If a software company wants to develop GPL3 software and also patent proprietary software and collect royalties for it they will, indeed, have to tread carefully, avoiding GPL3 software with a software patent retaliation clause.

However, if they decide that they just want to make good software, both GPL3 and proprietary, and get paid for that, they can simply make a choice to write off any potential software patent revenue and continue doing business. They can still file patents for defensive purposes, of course.
Posted by: FamilyManFirst   Posted on: 01/18/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

great license!  Linux Geek | 01/17/06
Geeze, you would think ...  Too Old For IT | 01/18/06
Re: Geeze, you would think ...  none none | 01/18/06
You are such a poser  nomorems | 01/18/06
Looks like a great license, and the final version will be even better.  DonnieBoy | 01/17/06
GPL Terms  dhopp@... | 01/18/06
Simply not true!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
Notice your own wording?  techboy_z | 01/18/06
Copyright protects absolutley nothing.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
Your knowledge of IP law is patthetic!  B.O.F.H. | 01/18/06
Your example proves nothing  FamilyManFirst | 01/18/06
There IS some truth there...  el1jones | 01/18/06
If your argument is that patent review needs overhauled, I agree.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
The idea of a patent  CobraA1 | 01/18/06
Is to protect your ideas.  osreinstall | 01/18/06
Re: Is to protect your ideas.  none none | 01/18/06
re:  CobraA1 | 01/18/06
Bull!  NetArch. | 01/18/06
The uncreative will be weeded out.  osreinstall | 01/18/06
Actually it is true  Linux User 147560 | 01/18/06
More like Karl Marx  osreinstall | 01/18/06
Study your history  Linux User 147560 | 01/18/06
Take a reading lesson.  osreinstall | 01/18/06
Squirrels?  Linux User 147560 | 01/18/06
Yep Squirrels  osreinstall | 01/18/06
So in a nutshell  Linux Guy 1000 | 01/18/06
1000, you are full of BS  osreinstall | 01/18/06
Copying is Stealing  Too Old For IT | 01/18/06
Yes, copying without attribution is stealing.  NetArch. | 01/18/06
That's why  nomorems | 01/18/06
I think mebbe you are lookin at the wrong bunch  plumnilly | 01/18/06
The problem is  Michael Kelly | 01/18/06
What are you talking about?  osreinstall | 01/18/06
I didn't say easy  Michael Kelly | 01/18/06
Patent length & pending application for  IAFarm2 | 01/18/06
Easy, Obvious or Simple. It doesn't matter.  osreinstall | 01/18/06
Obviousness DOES Matter  dsdjr | 01/19/06
Here is the link to the article.  osreinstall | 01/19/06
How So?  nucrash | 01/18/06
Good idea, wrong target  A.Sinic | 01/18/06
SPOT ON!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
Re: Good idea, wrong target  none none | 01/18/06
Right target: software patents in general  FamilyManFirst | 01/18/06
Stallman's personal gripe against DRM will end GPLed products  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
I prefer Linus's Stance on DRM  nucrash | 01/18/06
Linus may stay with current GPL  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
Not necessarily...  techboy_z | 01/18/06
STOP thinking DRM is about music and video.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
No it's about  Linux User 147560 | 01/18/06
I never thought I "owned" another's property.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
Your right it is more than piracy  Linux User 147560 | 01/18/06
Let me try once more, I do NOT care about a silly song or movie!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
Get a clue  Linux User 147560 | 01/18/06
No_Axe  nomorems | 01/18/06
LU, No_Ax has a valid point about non-media DRM.  Anton Philidor | 01/18/06
What more  nomorems | 01/18/06
If you believe that your more fool than I thought.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/19/06
Who exactly does it benefit?  CobraA1 | 01/18/06
Maybe in your world, not in mine.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
re: Maybe in your world, not in mine.  CobraA1 | 01/18/06
You never owned anything at the company you work for.  osreinstall | 01/18/06
Actually . . .  CobraA1 | 01/18/06
It is all 1s and 0s without a working program.  osreinstall | 01/18/06
DRM will not benefit the consumer.  Linux User 147560 | 01/18/06
Wrong LU#  osreinstall | 01/18/06
Go back and reinstall your OS again...  Linux Guy 1000 | 01/18/06
1000 those blinders work on you a lot better.  osreinstall | 01/18/06
Let them have their DRM, just take their copyright  rhavyn | 01/18/06
By law they will be required to release it to public domain.  osreinstall | 01/19/06
DRM is not about Your medical or financial data, or a companies documents  jimbo_z | 01/18/06
I can see you too are clueless about how DRM works.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/19/06
By users, software distributors or by FOSS programmers?  John Le'Brecage | 01/18/06
DRM is a non-starter  code_flogger | 01/18/06
Grow how?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/19/06
All patents must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 01/18/06
Why? So my ideas can be stolen by  John Zern | 01/18/06
You mean like Microsoft?  nomorems | 01/18/06
Who said it was ok for MS to do this?  John Zern | 01/19/06
I can see why  CobraA1 | 01/18/06
You are right, and it's why it will fail.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
We'll see  CobraA1 | 01/18/06
Umm hmmm.  nomorems | 01/18/06
DRM and Linux / GNU licence 3, FUD FUD FUD  hipparchus2001 | 01/18/06
Keep believing you can change it...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/19/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline