On TechRepublic: Why Linux will triumph over Windows
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 23 of 25:
Next »
« Previous
Wrong numbers.
You forgot that the interest is paid each year and there's interest on the interest from past years and salaries increase.

Let's say that we have someone just hired by IBM, so only the 5%/1% figures apply. And let's say further, and weirdly, that this individual has a 40 year career with IBM somehow.

As long as we're using strange numbers, let's say that this individual's pay averages $25,000 for 10 years and $50,000 for the next 10 years and $75,000 for the next 10 years, and $100,000 for the final 10 years.

And, a bit complicated, let's say that the interest earned each year is 4% of the total contributed, which is the total from the prior years (including interest) plus the 5% of the person's salary maximum plus IBM's 6% of the person's salary.
To reach 4%, the percentage paid every month (say) would have to be a bit over 4% because all of the money won't be there until the year ends.
I'm not going to add any further complications.

In that case, the 401(k) will contain a total of $551,679, of which 23% came from the employee, 27% came from IBM, and $277,000 (rounded) is interest.

Not much for 40 years work, is it?!

And that interest mostly comes in the final years. Takes 18 years of the 40 to obtain only 10% of the 40 year total. And the interest reaches 50% of the total after 32 years, so half the interest arrives in the final 8 years of employment.


So let's move the interest rate up to 10% per year, every year.

Now our friend is much better off, having a total of $2.1 million on which to retire, and $1.8 million of that is interest.

But, worth noting, takes him 34 years to reach 50% of that interest total. For the final 6 years he's finally getting a huge amount of interest.

So that's why they tell you to take risks in the early years, though whether someone can afford to be cautious toward the end is a whole other issue.

Looking at these calculations, I think I'd invest in a company providing inexpensive food.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 01/06/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

What is this country coming too.  Reap | 01/05/06
SCARY!  Roger Ramjet | 01/06/06
And cost of living skyrocketing  ebrke | 01/06/06
The next welfare state  Roger Ramjet | 01/06/06
Re. welfare  techboy_z | 01/06/06
Wll only work under a certain select set of circumstances.  Laff | 01/06/06
Worth mentioning a change in accounting rules.  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
Also worth mentioning: you probably can't retire.  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
Keeping a job? Are you kidding!?!  Laff | 01/06/06
Optimist  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
Misplaced blame  techboy_z | 01/06/06
I an not make the claims you do....My only basis  Laff | 01/06/06
No offense intended here just being honest....  Laff | 01/06/06
Immigration works.  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
I rhink the problem is what about the rest?  Laff | 01/06/06
Hope for home.  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
True simple answers are often WRONG!  Laff | 01/06/06
But why don't they...  techboy_z | 01/06/06
I agree with you, almost.  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
Some figures  maxo_z | 01/06/06
Hmmmm...Don't make near 100K per year myself.  Laff | 01/06/06
Has it truly gotten to the point where we are willing  Laff | 01/06/06
Wrong numbers.  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
Soilent Green?  Laff | 01/07/06
Chow... (NT)  Anton Philidor | 01/08/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc