On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 12 of 32:
Next »
« Previous
Not sure about this...
"Apple's iPod profits allow the company to retain the $0.99 fixed price, and competitors have to follow Apple's lead."

How is this so? Walmart.com has most songs at $0.88 per track, but some variably priced as well. And they also sell some full albums at various whole-album rates that come out to cheaper per-track rates than if bought as singles. This is a clear example of non-collusion...in fact an indication of competition since Walmart is obviously trying to price cheaper than the market leader in order to gain share.

Besides all this, I don't see variable pricing as a sign that collusion isn't going on, or lack of variable pricing as a sign that it is. I think the online retailers probably rationalize that having one price per track is just simpler and makes more sense to the consumer than seeing price fluctuations as songs wax and wane in popularity. Imagine the potential for customer ire as a song that a friend got for $0.50 one week, rises to $0.85 after a week of strong sales, just as you were about to get it based on your friend's recommendation. You're going to feel used when you see the new price. Clearly the digital companies all see the complexity of this model, and its potential for being a customer relations fiasco. Its just simpler to stay with a flat fee per track. Widespread commonsense doesn't spell collusion. We should be glad to have pervasive commonsense for a change. The labels sure don't have any. Good on the digital sellers for having some.
Posted by: techboy_z   Posted on: 01/04/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

For those  cashaww | 01/04/06
But also  GMTobias | 01/04/06
Eliot Spitzer Also Got Them on PAYOLA  Edward Meyers | 01/04/06
Good point  GMTobias | 01/04/06
DMCA is the cause of hollystupids woes.  cyber-shoplifter | 01/04/06
Copyright is not the problem  techboy_z | 01/04/06
Term of copyright is a major issue  tic swayback | 01/04/06
Our government can't even get the mail to my front door..  cyber-shoplifter | 01/04/06
Spitzer rocks  tic swayback | 01/04/06
My 1st tic of the New Year....  cyber-shoplifter | 01/04/06
Variable pricing already exists.  Anton Philidor | 01/04/06
Not sure about this...  techboy_z | 01/04/06
800 lb gorillas...  Anton Philidor | 01/04/06
Variable pricing - how novel  ishtar_z | 01/04/06
I LOVE allofmp3 & mp3search.ru  cyber-shoplifter | 01/04/06
I would pick variable price  GreatInca | 01/04/06
hollystupid should price from $0.00 to 50.00 cents MAX  cyber-shoplifter | 01/04/06
hollystupid should price from $0.00 to .50 cents MAX  cyber-shoplifter | 01/04/06
That's the problem  tic swayback | 01/04/06
at $2.99 a song the RIAA will have even more folks to sue..  cyber-shoplifter | 01/04/06
The value of a song  tic swayback | 01/04/06
"at least 99 cents"?  Anton Philidor | 01/04/06
lossless audio compression  cyber-shoplifter | 01/04/06
Just curious; which codec?  Anton Philidor | 01/04/06
Do you really believe that  tic swayback | 01/04/06
Less than $0.99.  Anton Philidor | 01/04/06
Silly Anton  tic swayback | 01/04/06
Why shouldn't the RIAA companies tell the truth...  Anton Philidor | 01/04/06
Why should we believe them now?  tic swayback | 01/05/06
$0.00 to $1.00 sounds like variable pricing to me?  cyber-shoplifter | 01/04/06
It ain't gonna be .01 to 1.00.  BitTwiddler | 01/04/06
RECORD LABELS JERKS  Jason Jones_z | 01/04/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here