On mySimon: Bacon Soap
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 25 of 36:
Next »
« Previous
Easiest solution yet ...
All users would have an online contact list with their ISP. This would be managed by the user in a Control Panel sort of environment. A switch on/off feature would be available. "On" = No SPAM, "Off" = I'm an idiot, SPAM me!

Would mean a little more work but I'm sure that an addon/plugin for every email client out there could easily be written.

Any email sent to their address is checked against their contact list and is rejected if it doesn't appear. Therefore no "unsolicited" emails get through.

Would also mean more load for the ISP's mail servers, but they get paid enough ... so upgrade! happy

Businesses with website applications will have to search for another more expensive filtering solution. But at least they can afford it. We can't.

And as for paying for eMail ... what exactly would we be paying for? No physical work is involved in sending eMails so no postmen to pay ... we'd be paying for CPU cyles and I'm sure the computer isn't on the payroll nor has a pension plan, so no benefit.
Posted by: Mistraal   Posted on: 02/06/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Email Tax  Joe Blow_z | 02/05/04
Since we're just talking hypothetical solutions  j.m.galvin | 02/05/04
Sorry - that was supposed to be a reply to the story  j.m.galvin | 02/05/04
It will work if "stamps" can be re-used...  Jomo_z | 02/09/04
Since we're just talking hypothetically  j.m.galvin | 02/05/04
Won't work  Fred Fredrickson | 02/05/04
Yeah, I'd thought of scripts - BUT  j.m.galvin | 02/05/04
everything can be hacked...  vef | 02/05/04
Ridiculous Idea, and Scary too!  mr big_z | 02/05/04
No, just utterly impractical  Fred Fredrickson | 02/05/04
Not that simple  vef | 02/05/04
re : EU probe a step behind Microsoft?  JWatson77 | 02/05/04
Excellent points.  deoren | 02/06/04
I'll pay to have Uncle Billy tossed in the can!!  Bobby Sskcat | 02/05/04
Sure Why not?  CaptainObvious | 02/05/04
I propose $15 per IM!  Bobby Sskcat | 02/05/04
Better yet  CaptainObvious | 02/05/04
The problem with micropayments  JPFeral | 02/05/04
bits are bits  maxo_z | 02/05/04
What about mass email worms  CaptainObvious | 02/05/04
Still won't work.  Cardinal_Bill | 02/05/04
The US Post Office also wanted to charge for e-Mail  B.O.F.H. | 02/05/04
Fritz Hollings would love it.  Eggs Ackley_z | 02/05/04
Let's not get emotional  vef | 02/05/04
Easiest solution yet ...  Mistraal | 02/06/04
Won't work either.  deoren | 02/06/04
I already pay -- too much  furl12@... | 02/06/04
so you move  JWatson77 | 02/07/04
pop-up ads and more!  kenlars99 | 02/07/04
Paying for email  BlueDog_z | 02/07/04
Payment is not in cash...  bernard.oflynn@... | 02/09/04
Good point Bernardo, but let's take it one step further.  IVLEEG | 02/10/04
license bulk mailers  Jim Johnson | 02/09/04
Snail mail costs, but I still get junk through my letterbox  Zipdude | 02/09/04
My post mailbox is full of paper SPAM that someone paid for...  balsover | 02/09/04
Let's just outlaw ALL advertising and get it over with.  IVLEEG | 02/10/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here