The only changes needed...
nucrash | 12/05/05
|
|
Tragic!
unoriginal_sin | 12/05/05
|
Screening in Linux vs. Wikipedia
bhartman36 | 12/05/05
|
|
"an editorial board with subject knowledge."
voice_of_all_reason | 12/05/05
|
Credibility
bhartman36 | 12/05/05
|
|
The power of vetted content
tic swayback | 12/05/05
|
|
Not quite...
JustAMuggle | 12/05/05
|
|
With Linux, someone is in charge.
John L. Ries | 12/05/05
|
Is there really a rush?
bhartman36 | 12/06/05
|
|
As usual...
voice_of_all_reason | 12/05/05
|
|
Wikipedia is interesting, but should be considered with a grain of salt
CobraA1 | 12/05/05
|
|
A grain of salt
eric.d.dobbs@... | 12/05/05
|
|
Wikipedia is a microcosm of WWW at large
yyuko@... | 12/05/05
|
|
I agree
etheran | 12/05/05
|
|
the source?
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
But credibility is relative
John L. Ries | 12/05/05
|
|
give proof!
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
give proof!
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
No need
John L. Ries | 12/05/05
|
|
bad example
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
bad example
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
how much do you know?
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
Not much
John L. Ries | 12/05/05
|
|
disagree
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
correction
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
Intellectual suicide.
Zinoron | 12/07/05
|
|
you missed it
timeofmind | 12/07/05
|
|
Can I imagine? There is no need.
Zinoron | 12/08/05
|
|
not quite
rrrr | 12/05/05
|
|
Not ready for prime time
NobodyHome | 12/05/05
|
|
Did you do anything besides read the article
nucrash | 12/05/05
|
|
Yikes!
BitTwiddler | 12/05/05
|
|
Wikipedia's inherent flaw
rrrr | 12/05/05
|
|
Would both not be good?
bghost | 12/05/05
|
|
can't be
rrrr | 12/05/05
|
|
hmm....
bghost | 12/07/05
|
|
Not enough
John L. Ries | 12/05/05
|
|
It's crap!
Tezcatlipoca | 12/05/05
|
|
I agree
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
You haven't really won a debate...
John L. Ries | 12/05/05
|
|
I agree
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
Anonymous Users can EDIT Wikipedia?
mwagner@... | 12/05/05
|
|
Information-gathering actually HAS changed, deal with it
Sioen | 12/05/05
|
|
The "New Information World Order"
bhartman36 | 12/05/05
|
|
Trust
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
Valuable Information
bhartman36 | 12/06/05
|
|
way off
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
Information vs. truth
bhartman36 | 12/06/05
|
|
You missed it. Try reading my post.
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
Re: You missed it. Try reading my post.
bhartman36 | 12/06/05
|
|
Re: You missed it. Try reading my post.
bhartman36 | 12/06/05
|
|
again - points missed
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
On Colors, Craziness, and Cures
bhartman36 | 12/06/05
|
|
ok, this is good
timeofmind | 12/07/05
|
|
What algorithm do you use to arrive at the "zero credibility" result?
dcstrain | 12/05/05
|
|
if(credibility == unknown) { credibility = 0; }
CobraA1 | 12/06/05
|
|
Credibility Equation
bhartman36 | 12/06/05
|
|
fine line
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
The Difference between Credible and True
bhartman36 | 12/06/05
|
|
two different things
timeofmind | 12/07/05
|
|
actually, sorry
timeofmind | 12/07/05
|
|
The Difference between Credible and True
bhartman36 | 12/06/05
|
|
Credibility Equation
bhartman36 | 12/06/05
|
|
WOW
jswift | 12/05/05
|
|
It's Like a Fungus
Lisanne001 | 12/05/05
|
|
Opinion of a fact? Right!
NeverLift | 12/05/05
|
|
open source
rsars | 12/05/05
|
|
Can you ever be 100% sure about any information?
John_Doe69 | 12/05/05
|
|
This is the other end of that stick
NeverLift | 12/05/05
|
|
encyclopedias contain facts?
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
facts
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
It's not a problem, it's a "feature"
DanielB | 12/05/05
|
|
How Does One Edit 500,000 articles?
Lisanne001 | 12/05/05
|
|
Delegation
John L. Ries | 12/05/05
|
|
Reality is a matter of perception - Wikipedia reflects 'our' perception
benram | 12/05/05
|
|
'our' perception is psychotic
rrrr | 12/05/05
|
|
Who gets to determine what is true?
Flash00 | 12/05/05
|
|
good point!
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
nobody
rrrr | 12/06/05
|
|
the source is not important
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
A true testament to wikipedia's success
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
Two Instances. Do you believe that they are minority circumstances?
Lisanne001 | 12/05/05
|
|
refer to the first report in the article
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
I disagree
CobraA1 | 12/05/05
|
|
bad example
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
Good example
CobraA1 | 12/06/05
|
|
I agree, mostly
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
people
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
That is like saying...
Zinoron | 12/07/05
|
|
Perhaps Not Even 10,000 Editors
Lisanne001 | 12/05/05
|
|
it's left to the public
timeofmind | 12/05/05
|
|
Perhaps Not Even 10,000 Editors
rrrr | 12/05/05
|
|
The wikipedia is a teenager
daver_z | 12/05/05
|
|
OK, I'll Buy That Analogy
Lisanne001 | 12/05/05
|
|
a suggestion
f3773t | 12/05/05
|
|
rating system
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
re: rating system
f3773t | 12/06/05
|
|
authorities
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
backup copies
f3773t | 12/06/05
|
|
I see
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
pending wikipedia debacle
top_manager | 12/05/05
|
|
time
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
rating system above
timeofmind | 12/06/05
|
|
which articles?
eric.d.dobbs@... | 12/06/05
|
|
This isnt causing skeptics
ickusslime@... | 12/07/05
|
|
Correction
ickusslime@... | 12/07/05
|
|
Considering that...
Zinoron | 12/07/05
|
|
Growing pains for Wikipedia
paradoxlie-freeswim@... | 12/07/05
|
|
your brilliant
timeofmind | 12/08/05
|
|
Wikipedia is great
Sectusempra | 02/17/06
|
Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost-effective solutions to real-life IT problems.
