On CBS MoneyWatch: 6 things NOT to do on Twitter, Facebook
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 26 of 35:
Next »
« Previous
Public Inspection
Hi, John.

You said:

It would be an easy matter to modify the software to secretly record how each person voted; even easier if the source code is not subject to public inspection.

There would be inspection. It just wouldn't be open inspection. There could be government audits to make sure that the software is doing what it's designed to do. To use the ICBM example again: Just because the design/logistics of the missiles is secret, doesn't mean that they're never inspected. What's needed is a line-by-line government analysis of the software. (This is why it wouldn't be commercially-developed. Proprietary, copyrighted code could never be used for such a purpose.) Then that analysis is kept absolutely secret. Again, this would lead to a system no worse off than what we have now, in terms of fraud.


And don't forget the reality check factor: If a candidate is at 17% the day before an election, it's not going to be credible to make him the winner.

In an anonymous voting system like ours, it will never, ever, under any conditions, be possible to completely eliminate the possibility of fraud, because the only way to do that is to keep records of who voted for whom. Having said that, it's possible to devise a system that does a great deal better than our current one, and produces a higher participation rate than our current ~ 20%.
Posted by: bhartman36   Posted on: 10/10/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

In a word:  HypnoToad | 10/07/05
All Hail The HypnoToad...  Doc Farmer | 10/08/05
HypnoToad gets my vote  Squawkbox | 10/08/05
All glory to the HypnoToad...  jbroche18 | 10/10/05
Why Not Use Lottery Machines?  Doc Farmer | 10/08/05
Just What We Need...  progan01@... | 10/08/05
Perhaps you should re-read my article.  Doc Farmer | 10/08/05
Receipts  bhartman36 | 10/10/05
Not going to happen...  Outside T. Box | 10/10/05
Money and Politics  bhartman36 | 10/10/05
Yes, it would fragment parties  John L. Ries | 10/10/05
Re: Money and politics  John L. Ries | 10/10/05
Old Reliable machines...  jbroche18 | 10/10/05
Old Reliable machines...  Doc Farmer | 10/18/05
A precinct captain's dream  John L. Ries | 10/10/05
A precinct captain's dream  Doc Farmer | 10/18/05
The more complex the system...  John L. Ries | 10/08/05
Can't stop progress...  X Marks The Spot | 10/09/05
That argument could be used...  John L. Ries | 10/10/05
I-voting  bhartman36 | 10/10/05
Hah!  Outside T. Box | 10/10/05
Hell, no!  bhartman36 | 10/10/05
Fools gold  John L. Ries | 10/10/05
Secrecy  bhartman36 | 10/10/05
The problem here is...  John L. Ries | 10/10/05
Public Inspection  bhartman36 | 10/10/05
How much do you trust...  John L. Ries | 10/10/05
Trust, But Verify...  bhartman36 | 10/10/05
The Best Solution  Roger Ramjet | 10/10/05
I like it.  Update victim | 10/10/05
Correct solution - FAST and SAFE  Update victim | 10/10/05
Overestimating Voters  bhartman36 | 10/10/05
Where am I  Jay Cash | 10/21/05
Where Is You?  Doc Farmer | 10/24/05
Message has been deleted.  myfevertoy | 10/22/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and