On TV.com: TRUE BLOOD'S Lafayette Gets a Mom
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 13 of 31:
Next »
« Previous
Give it a rest and try working your brain
The use of digital or film jamming technology will not jeapordize our borders. First, if a security guy or even a program is monitoring the video feeds, the jammed image is very easily recognized (a very simple algorithm just looking at the image histogram could do it) and can be used to trigger the very security response that the "bad guy" hopes to avoid. It's like sending up a flair and saying "here I am."

Secondly, it's very easy to frustrate the IR return which actually comes from the window over the CCD chip. Silicon CCDs are sensitive to all of the Near Infa-Red (NIR) spectral range in addition to the visible. A glass filter with a coating that reflects the NIR is used to suppress the invisible light and achieve good color balance. The "Nightshot" option is just a mechanical device that removes this filter from the light path (Note that the GT guys are using a Sony HandyCam with a Nightshot capability to find the cameras). Removing the IR filter removes the optical return needed to find the camera. Most surveilance camera (especially those in low light conditions) have no NIR filter already. Thus those camera will be very difficult to find.

You sound like Henny Penny with "the sky is falling" and doom and gloom. Try understanding the technology and how things really work before sounding the alarm and looking "stupid," to quote your own self.
Posted by: jacarter3   Posted on: 09/19/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Wild Weasel mission for digital cameras?  Chad_z | 09/19/05
How better to drive sales...  Zinoron | 09/19/05
The terrorists will love this technology.  JonathonDoe | 09/19/05
Perhaps because...  Zinoron | 09/19/05
Be sure to remember that when ...  JonathonDoe | 09/19/05
While I agree with you to lesser extent  voska | 09/19/05
could be applied to the battelfield  woot! | 09/19/05
It's been done to death...  jacarter3 | 09/19/05
Hmmm! This prior usage should VOID any patent applications. (NT)  Update victim | 09/19/05
2 things  maxo_z | 09/19/05
I can appreciate your point...  SysAn63 | 09/20/05
You haven't thought it through...  mlynch1234 | 09/20/05
Give it a rest and try working your brain  jacarter3 | 09/19/05
"But you can't confiscate a phone"  BitTwiddler | 09/19/05
ROTFL New tech knocks out digital cameras  Palmyra | 09/19/05
Has inventor heard about polarizers eliminating glare?  FirstNLastN | 09/19/05
Now...  rapson | 09/19/05
There are some solutions to that  voska | 09/19/05
(NT) Linky link?  Jack-Booted EULA | 09/19/05
Be careful, you might fry your own electronics.  osreinstall | 09/19/05
They have that already  Jeff Spicoli | 09/19/05
Blurry pictures and blast of light  Boot_Agnostic | 09/19/05
The article indicates DIGITAL cameras, but  Update victim | 09/19/05
Been using it a long time.  escapepod | 09/19/05
That's a felony in Kalifornia.  bookmonger | 09/19/05
True, if pointed at "people".  escapepod | 09/19/05
Anyone that knows anything about cameras  rock06r | 09/20/05
Reflective surfaces?  Dr_Zinj | 09/20/05
Your Kidding Right?  GTO_Patrick | 09/20/05
The London Bmobers....  GTO_Patrick | 09/20/05
Another Terrorism Thought  GTO_Patrick | 09/20/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here