On MovieTome: R2D2 was in Star Trek?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 42 of 88:
Next »
« Previous
Reread your reply to John B.
Reread your own comment you made to John B's reply, and you'll see all the anti-Open Source in pure english.

Open source is a fuzzy concept in the minds of most people.

I don't accept that the OSI is the arbiter of the proper definition of the term "open source"

Sounds to me like you don't understand it, therefore, other people are going to have a tough time too. Why else would you claim that share source is better?

From my perspective, Open Source is far better than shared source because there are, in many cases, few restrictions other than making a profit.
Posted by: George Jay   Posted on: 03/01/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Don't care too much about SQL Server, ...  Judas I. | 02/28/05
They can stick their SQL code where the sun don't shine.  DonnieBoy | 02/28/05
Somebody  FilledOut | 03/01/05
That somebody is also me. Peace.  systemcleaner | 03/01/05
Who cares?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/01/05
The Chinese might want to check if for back doors.  DonnieBoy | 03/01/05
And they'd recognize the code for back doors...  Anton Philidor | 03/01/05
It's how they can keep the digital divide  FilledOut | 03/03/05
Debugging  htotten | 02/28/05
Edit & Continue  seosamh_z | 03/01/05
Shared Source != Open Source  John Le'Brecage | 02/28/05
1 question and 1 correction  NonZealot | 02/28/05
Par course I suppose.  John Le'Brecage | 02/28/05
Tsk tsk  NonZealot | 03/01/05
He does have a point about "deficient"  Anton Philidor | 03/01/05
Good thought there Anton  John Le'Brecage | 03/01/05
What???!!!  NonZealot | 03/01/05
Choice among synonyms  Anton Philidor | 03/02/05
To complete...  John Le'Brecage | 03/02/05
Errk... On correction of my own. (penultimate bad)  John Le'Brecage | 02/28/05
A few reality checks here  TrollSlayer | 03/01/05
When?  rapson | 03/01/05
Clarify? Please?  John Le'Brecage | 03/01/05
More semantic hair-splitting  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
Clarification is not hair splitting  Robert Crocker | 03/01/05
Did you read this *before* you had your lunch today, John ;-)?  Zogg | 03/01/05
Precisely the reason...  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
I can't agree  NonZealot | 03/01/05
Re:  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
Uphill battle John C.  John Le'Brecage | 03/01/05
You write...  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
You can't be arbitrary  Robert Crocker | 03/01/05
neither can you  Dave F_z | 03/01/05
shared source or Shared Source?  Robert Crocker | 03/01/05
As I noted in my other post to you...  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
Concept versus legal term  Robert Crocker | 03/01/05
I quite understand your point John C...  John Le'Brecage | 03/02/05
Is Open Source Fuzzy to most?  George Jay | 03/01/05
Question  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
Which is where...  rapson | 03/01/05
Re: Which  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
Reread your reply to John B.  George Jay | 03/01/05
Claim  rapson | 03/01/05
Who are you arguing with?  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
MS has NEVER called it open source.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/01/05
In fact I've not complained at all  John Le'Brecage | 03/01/05
hmm...  jdahs@... | 03/01/05
No, he was understood  Robert Crocker | 03/02/05
Many licenses, many open sources  Anton Philidor | 03/02/05
ONE OSSI  Robert Crocker | 03/02/05
Definitions that are owned.  Anton Philidor | 03/02/05
Conclusion of prior post.  Anton Philidor | 03/02/05
Open source was around long before the OSI came into existance ...  George Mitchell | 03/01/05
Wilful misrepresentation  whisperycat | 03/01/05
Re: Willful  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
Similarities..  Patrick Jones | 03/02/05
Start stealing open source ideas?  rock06r | 03/02/05
Skeletins in the closet  Roger Ramjet | 03/01/05
I remember this "slogan"  widge_z | 03/01/05
Conflict of interest  Roger Ramjet | 03/01/05
Whose interest?  Patrick Jones | 03/01/05
Clear conflict of interest.  maxo_z | 03/01/05
Once again..  Patrick Jones | 03/01/05
Really?  NonZealot | 03/01/05
How about Sun  voska | 03/01/05
Move on please  seosamh_z | 03/01/05
WINE  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
Would we?  Roger Ramjet | 03/02/05
Practical illustration Shared Source inadequacy  whisperycat | 03/01/05
I fail to see your point?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/01/05
How long would that take?  voska | 03/01/05
Easy..  Patrick Jones | 03/01/05
As long as there is a timely update  Michael Kelly | 03/01/05
Life is too short for this too  jorwell | 03/01/05
Cost vs. Benefit  j.m.galvin | 03/01/05
Not necessarily  rapson | 03/01/05
And yet....  rock06r | 03/02/05
Patent lawsuits  maxo_z | 03/01/05
Certainly not Sisyphus, John  Anton Philidor | 03/01/05
But, to give you credit, you have King Minos right...  Anton Philidor | 03/01/05
Re: Mythology  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
Whose job is it? (Main point of article)  Anton Philidor | 03/01/05
Right in principle  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 03/01/05
Principle and practice  Anton Philidor | 03/01/05
JC  meetwo | 03/01/05
That's not very fair!  TechType | 03/02/05
"Thier very professional existance is at steak."??  Anton Philidor | 03/02/05
welcome back from Europe  JasonL31 | 03/02/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and