On CBS MoneyWatch: Warning: This Blog Will Harm Your Health
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 7:
Next »
« Previous
And you mention AMD, because ? ....
AMD was not mentioned anywhere. Fell free to justify though why Intel is SO FAR BEHIND in multi-threading tools and environments.

Because their SMPs are 5-7 years behind? Or they cannot get it right? I think it is both.
Posted by: michael_t   Posted on: 08/29/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

If Intel just NOW started supporting the multithreading, how could people  michael_t | 08/28/06
AMD admittedly is far behind in the compiler race  georgeou | 08/28/06
Do commercial SW vendors distribute different binaries for Intel vs AMD?  enduser_z | 08/28/06
And you mention AMD, because ? ....  michael_t | 08/29/06
What about C#?  enduser_z | 08/28/06
There must be more to it  eb276 | 08/28/06
Thanks!  enduser_z | 08/28/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here