On TV.com: Why Is Everyone in TV High School SO OLD
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 19 of 21:
Next »
« Previous
So?
You mean they might be going to open source that slow, must update all the time, 1970s interface language that only a masochist would use? Also holds the record for failed software upgrade installation (at least on my computer ;-))

Why would SUn want to do that?
Posted by: TonyMcS   Posted on: 05/16/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Promises  SQLServer | 05/16/06
It's the End of the World as we Know it  nucrash | 05/16/06
And I Feel Fine  Letophoro | 05/16/06
The start of a new generation of programmers  sdexp | 05/17/06
This could produce a gain...  Anton Philidor | 05/16/06
There is the possibility of...  zkiwi | 05/16/06
That may be the reason for the delay.  Anton Philidor | 05/16/06
Compatibility: common core is irrelevant  Robert Kohlenberger | 05/18/06
Open Source does NOT equal forking. Take Apache for instance.  DonnieBoy | 05/16/06
LGPL  OhMyGosh | 05/16/06
MS tried it already...  techboy_z | 05/16/06
Microsoft JVM was compatible  Spacely Spacerockets | 05/17/06
Different uses. Java will be forked !!  anti-zdnet-hype | 05/18/06
Come on dude...  jasonp@... | 09/01/06
.Net  OhMyGosh | 05/16/06
You make a very good point....  techboy_z | 05/16/06
Sun already allowing open source VM builds  fernando.cassia@... | 05/16/06
Maybe...  Richard Flude | 05/16/06
So?  TonyMcS | 05/16/06
Open Sores is teh ghey  Jeff the god of biscuits | 05/16/06
A little ointment  fireman949 | 05/17/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here