SCO finally reveals alleged Unix violations

TalkBack 6 of 38:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

One issue about sealing

I think one reason that sealing the documents presents is that if
any of the allegations are in fact true, it prevents programmers
from fixing Linux to be rid of those infringements.

If SCO was merely trying to protect its intellectual property, they
should be happy to see infringing code removed (and be
compensated for past inclusions). Because they're deliberately
keeping these alleged infringements secret, they can't be readily
addressed by the coding community, and will this remain in
Linux. This leads me to believe that their motivations are more
in line with stopping Linux use than with redressing past
wrongs.

Posted by: tic swayback   Posted on: 11/01/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Memory Analysis Best Practices Within Eclipse Quest Software Poor Java performance costs your business money and customers. However ... Download Now
• The Dell OEM Industry Solutions Group Beefs Up the ONE Unified Technology Platform Developed by MDI Security Systems Dell When engineers at MDI Security Systems design a global video surveillance ... Download Now
• Get top-ranked Novell support for Red Hat at 50% less Novell A simplified IT environment isn't just less complex, it's more reliable. ... Download Now