On CBS MoneyWatch: Why Debit Cards Are Dangerous
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 15:
Next »
« Previous
Lucid post
With which I have one quibble. USPTO does require a prior art submission, but in software the examiner has no means of validating it. It's the old absence of proof not being proof of absence thing. I'm not wure what additional safeguard you would propose - it's been driving PTO crazy.
Posted by: IT_User   Posted on: 09/13/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Closed source just as exposed.  maxo_z | 09/13/05
Maybe not  Anti_Zealot | 09/13/05
Marketing must be required for patent validity  Update victim | 09/13/05
I would like to patent the term "Patent Reform"...  BitTwiddler | 09/13/05
I don't think you can patent a term  tic swayback | 09/13/05
Logic, does it apply?  Update victim | 09/13/05
A few points  Nigel Johnstone | 09/13/05
Lucid post  IT_User | 09/13/05
I doubt that  Nigel Johnstone | 09/13/05
You don't need a lot of money to file a law suit  voska | 09/13/05
Sophistry  Anton Philidor | 09/13/05
Re: Sophistry  Nigel Johnstone | 09/13/05
I believe that the root of the problem is  SysAn63 | 09/13/05
OR.....  DarbyOhara | 09/14/05
RE: Patent reform: Who's on first?  sw@... | 08/27/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and