On The Insider: The Best of 09: Vote for your Favorites!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 12 of 18:
Next »
« Previous
Notice that 64 bits was a lot easier on Linux.
Microsoft is paying for bolting everthing to the OS and intermingling the code. Makes it extremely dificult to make different kernels, and also the problems of the vulnerabilities.
Posted by: DonnieBoy   Posted on: 04/25/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

ZDNet, just doing it part in spreading FUD...  Qbt | 04/25/05
What hatred?  nucrash | 04/25/05
Did ya miss the word ...  Judas I. | 04/25/05
Maybe...  doe_z | 04/25/05
Felt the same way about MS DOS 5  Guy Fawkes | 04/25/05
I dont think so...  JoeMama_z | 04/25/05
wel...according to AMD....  Prognosticator | 04/25/05
I wont be surprised  michael-t | 04/25/05
Win32 limitations  Roger Ramjet | 04/25/05
huh?  JoeMama_z | 04/25/05
I see  Roger Ramjet | 05/16/05
Notice that 64 bits was a lot easier on Linux.  DonnieBoy | 04/25/05
32-bit Windows versus 64-bit Windows  pinpintalk@... | 04/25/05
not an option??  ZooberSoft | 04/27/05
i have just installed the winXP-64 on an athlon64 system and am having  wessonjoe | 04/28/05
Good news!  Reverend MacFellow | 05/10/05
UNIX has run on 64 bits for 10 years  whisperycat | 05/11/05
You are misleading and do not understand the market  tanya222 | 07/05/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here