On CHOW: 10 good cheap liquors
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 16:
Next »
« Previous
Not surprising
No_Ax has been claiming for some time now that Microsoft is going to make it difficult, if not impossible, for open-source to make use of its IP. In looking through the agreement, I didn't see anything about MS having to provide the IP on the exact same terms for all licensees. Is there any reason why Microsoft can't license under different terms for different parties, as long as it is complying with the settlement? What about this Sun-MS agreement violates the settlement?

Carl Rapson
Posted by: rapson   Posted on: 11/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Hmmm, next month: Java and .Net become the same.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/29/04
They are already  Roger Ramjet | 11/29/04
Oops, except for Mono  NonZealot | 11/29/04
Tired  Philip Stears | 12/02/04
Stop Hiding And Answer The Postings On The Microsoft 80,000 System Crashes  itanalyst | 11/29/04
Are you infatuated with No_Axe?  NonZealot | 11/29/04
That's funny!  rapson | 11/30/04
maybe  JasonL31 | 11/30/04
MS will Teach Marketing, Sun will Teach Coding  brenthawkinsmd | 11/29/04
The conflict between MCPP and Open Source  David Mohring | 11/29/04
Not surprising  rapson | 11/29/04
Section 6. CONFIDENTIALITY - Non-disclosure terms Vs Open Source  David Mohring | 11/29/04
I aagree, open source is going to be left wanting.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/29/04
Antitrust and Oligopoly:Exclusion deals between Monopoly and other vendors  David Mohring | 11/29/04
you have so little faith in ms  JasonL31 | 11/30/04
How the mighty have fallen.  alterego_z | 11/29/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here