On TV.com: Is COMMUNITY or MODERN FAMILY better?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 40 of 97:
Next »
« Previous
The unity of Unix
It started out as a good article and didn't favor linux and mentioned BSD (so thats good) until I got to the second page. Thats where the typical FUD started coming in.

What it does mean is that the Red Hat guy's ramp-up to Solaris competence is very small compared to the hurdles faced by a competitor whose experience is encapsulated by an MCSE designation.

No, what it means is you hired an incompetent person. If they can't transfer basic skills of setting up accounts and file permissions then they shoulld have MCSE.

People who categorize the Unix market as splintered or fractured are generally trying to compare it unfavorably to Microsoft's Windows. That's simply wrong:

No its right, you just don't want to admit it.

Windows is a brand, Unix a set of ideas. The Windows brand has been consistently handled, but there's essentially no continuity of ideas between the 3.0, 95, NT, and Longhorn Windows generations. The Unix hardware makers, in contrast, have tried hard to differentiate their products through branding when, in reality, all of their products have been part of the same family.

Uh no they haven't. Each Unix is so different from the next (except the BSDs cuz they are uber-leet) they are not the same, especially linux.

Remember, there are bad guys -- companies that value money over progress -- in the race, but if you work with Red Hat the enemy isn't Sun; and if you work with OS X the enemy isn't Linux. For any Unix, the enemy is Microsoft.

Couldn't be farther from the truth. Companies are out to make money, its calling being FOR PROFIT. Thats what companies do. If you are Red Hat, your enemy is Sun, Microsoft, and Apple. Anyone not running Red Hat would be their enemy. If you run OS X the enemy is linux, but thats a moot point now that OS X is taking linux share and soon it will be dead. For any unix the enemy is not Microsoft, but anyone not using your software.

There's a simple, personal bottom line to this: Unix is Unix, the benefits come from openness, community, and 50 years of consistent progress in the implementation of a handful of key ideas.

You forget the other parts of the bottom line, bashing MS every chance you get, talking out of your butt, flaming new people.

Next time your feeling low self esteem and feel the need to bash Microsoft so you can raise it and your ego by the praise of all 10 linux users you should probably do it on a site thats dedicated to such things and operating systems.
Posted by: Loverock Davidson   Posted on: 07/27/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Darn tootin'  Linux User 147560 | 07/27/05
RE: Darn Tootin'  Monkey_MCSE | 07/27/05
ZDNet is blatantly pro-MS, anti-everything else  NonZealot | 07/27/05
I Equate ZDNet To Reading The Enquirer  itanalyst | 07/27/05
the facts are in the fud on these forums, the rest is zdnet articles :P  linuxoverwindows | 07/28/05
Are you insane? ADNet is Anti-MS all they way!  John Zern | 07/27/05
Like many other sites, ZDNET is sponsored by Microsoft  IT-sys | 07/27/05
Yes, it is true that Windows is the one that is not compatible.  DonnieBoy | 07/27/05
Nope  Loverock Davidson | 07/27/05
OMG!  Roger Ramjet | 07/27/05
Time to check the phase of the moon (NT)  Loverock Davidson | 07/27/05
majority of OS's are unix  dwjunix | 07/27/05
While I agree with your basic point  Sxooter_z | 07/27/05
Can't find a file? Oh please.  hulse_kevin | 07/27/05
actually...  linuxoverwindows | 07/28/05
Nope, nope...  horusfalcon | 07/29/05
But does Unix have the right philosophy?  jorwell | 07/27/05
there is/was that cursed curses thing...  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 07/27/05
I might be wrong but  jorwell | 07/27/05
Memory Mapped IO; direct cursor addressing  mggordon | 07/27/05
you do know that...  linuxoverwindows | 07/28/05
Yes, UNIX has the right philosophy...  prime21 | 07/27/05
Very nice!  Yen_z | 07/27/05
questions  toadlife | 07/27/05
things that won't die & big ears..  thirtyeast | 07/27/05
So You Think The Recycle Bin Is It?  PMC-CON | 07/28/05
*Yawn*  toadlife | 07/28/05
Windows explorer is IE  voska | 07/28/05
yeah...  linuxoverwindows | 07/28/05
Kill doesn't kill every process  voska | 07/28/05
process-exporer is weak!  toadlife | 07/28/05
I specifically said I wasn't comparing Windows and Unix  jorwell | 07/28/05
one drawback of everything being a stream  woot! | 07/28/05
A few curses  jorwell | 07/29/05
Seems that Macintosh  In_the_end_I_Win | 07/29/05
Unix cheap?  nomorems | 07/27/05
Unix is cheap for the manufacturers  jorwell | 07/28/05
how can you...  linuxoverwindows | 07/28/05
apple isn't expensive  dwjunix | 07/28/05
The unity of Unix  Loverock Davidson | 07/27/05
The article is still pretty solid though...  nucrash | 07/27/05
Thanks - and the key research started in the mid fifties  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 07/27/05
Can you provide links  nucrash | 07/27/05
NT was not brand new  Richard Flude | 07/27/05
Money over progress  jorwell | 07/27/05
Maybe you took it wrong  DemonX | 07/27/05
More Gates as Edison drivel.  hulse_kevin | 07/27/05
More Internet is Driver Drivel  PMC-CON | 07/27/05
Rebuttal  Roger Ramjet | 07/27/05
Flames Originate (for me) in Sun's Lies  PMC-CON | 07/27/05
Sorry to hear that  Roger Ramjet | 07/28/05
How about self-righteousness.  Anton Philidor | 07/28/05
Interesting take  Roger Ramjet | 07/28/05
you got it right  zzz1234567890 | 07/27/05
OS snobs  auto.master | 07/27/05
I agree  Otto_Delete | 07/27/05
Re: OS snobs  none none | 07/27/05
Better OS can built.  Wagadonga | 07/27/05
no perfect OS  dwjunix | 07/27/05
Microsoft has no interest in peaceful co-existence.  hulse_kevin | 07/27/05
Linux desktop inadequacy  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/27/05
Hidden Content Removal Tool  PMC-CON | 07/27/05
Not the same thing  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/27/05
Really?  Richard Flude | 07/27/05
The timeline in the article stopped at least ten years ago.  Anton Philidor | 07/27/05
No, I don't agree  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 07/27/05
Software quality.  Anton Philidor | 07/27/05
Astute observation  Roger Ramjet | 07/27/05
Right on!  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 07/27/05
The "rich client experience" is the show.  Anton Philidor | 07/27/05
The power of genuine control.  hulse_kevin | 07/27/05
Two different views.  Anton Philidor | 07/27/05
How do you figure....  nucrash | 07/27/05
Remember the complaints about "IBM Linux"...  Anton Philidor | 07/27/05
Freedom of speech  IT_User | 07/27/05
Red Hat?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/27/05
Two basic OS designs exist today  toadlife | 07/27/05
What about AS/400?  jorwell | 07/28/05
Yeah there are others  toadlife | 07/28/05
Successful in the marketplace  jorwell | 08/02/05
Quite correct  Boot_Agnostic | 08/02/05
Not quite  jorwell | 08/03/05
How about the security of Windows?  aquasys | 07/27/05
Have to laugh at many of you here...  John Zern | 07/27/05
Easy.. or not.. experts say..  thirtyeast | 07/27/05
There are gppd amd bad admins  Boot_Agnostic | 07/31/05
Was there a purpose to this limited history lesson?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/27/05
Message has been deleted.  roaming_z | 07/28/05
Purpose  Roger Ramjet | 07/28/05
Linux is not Unix(tm)  amclaren | 07/28/05
Linux is a Unix clone  moonlitfire | 07/30/05
RE: Linux is a Unix clone  amclaren | 07/30/05
RE: Linux is a Unix clone  cbradshaw@... | 08/03/05
Linux is a Unix clone  moonlitfire | 08/11/05
UNIX is much more unified  michael_t | 08/01/05
Unix and Linux  tecpar | 08/02/05
RE: The unity of Unix  kinge | 09/27/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Meet Doc