On The Insider: Kate Gosselin Involved in Talk Show?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 34:
Next »
« Previous
I've made this point for years.
As many here know, I do factory automation. Last year we took on a task to automate a plant of a regional dog food company. They employed around 120 factory workers with a burdened cost of around $23 an hour per person. (Burden costs include vacation, sick leave, insurance, taxes, employee building welfare, etc.)

After completing the project, the number fell to 32 factory people and that includes four techs. to keep it all humming along. No matter how you look at it, these folks are out of a job and their ability to find like work is some where between slim and none. After all, most factories are doing the same and are laying off people. (Or moving to low wage locations.)

The question that someone has to ask is, what happens when the general population can no longer find work, and make a wage to buy these products? So far I've not heard one reasonable answer. And no, go get more training is NOT an answer unless you can say specifically what it is they are to be trained in and what the job prospects are for them.
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 03/12/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

MCDonalds is even entering the outsourcing game  JasonL31 | 03/11/05
Automation reduces potential errors.  B.O.F.H. | 03/12/05
I've made this point for years.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/12/05
It's not that new  IT_User | 03/13/05
Hmmm, yes and no...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/13/05
Its called Malthusian Economics...  Dave F_z | 03/13/05
Or WAR!!! Why create a whole new source when we can  Laff | 03/13/05
Growth industries  Roger Ramjet | 03/14/05
Butt don't all those jobs you listed depend on an economic  Laff | 03/14/05
Interrelationships  Roger Ramjet | 03/14/05
Not true, all of them are declining.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/14/05
Here's where I'd direct a youth today  voska | 03/14/05
Sorry but no...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/14/05
Rise of the Machines  osreinstall | 03/14/05
And the flip side - people OUGHT to work terrible worthless mind numbing  quietLee | 03/14/05
Were you trying to make a point?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/14/05
For the sake of argument....  maxo_z | 03/15/05
er.. .60 ... not 6.00  maxo_z | 03/15/05
In some sense I.T. has been about this  Mark Miller | 03/12/05
I would also like to see a 30 hour work week.  DonnieBoy | 03/13/05
Nope....like IT the future for maintaining automation  Laff | 03/13/05
You know if it ever got to that point  voska | 03/14/05
Seems I remember a story about a man who was working  Laff | 03/13/05
Some jobs but not all  Chad_z | 03/12/05
There is what we hope, and then there is REALITY or what is  Laff | 03/13/05
I heard this same thing when I was a kid  voska | 03/14/05
Even if that is true I do not know if that will remain so.  Laff | 03/14/05
You need to know where the real economy is  voska | 03/14/05
3 to 4 hundred years!?! Seriously?  Laff | 03/14/05
Greed will prevent it  voska | 03/14/05
When all is said and done...I am but a cog iin the machine  Laff | 03/14/05
As long as we're talking some day.  Anton Philidor | 03/14/05
Both are smaller than diminished innovation  MyLord | 03/14/05
Okay what gives.  IT Scion | 03/14/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here