On CHOW: Girls who hate girly drinks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 41:
Next »
« Previous
Retain experienced workers?
Yeah, right. Companies are seeking to get rid of workers, or at least pigeonhole them - regardless of how good they are.

I do agree the 9-to-5 method is unsustainable, as it leads to traffic congestion and other real problems.

And with the increase of costs in health care and gasoline, never mind offshoring and other practices that are somewhat detrimental to the economy and people not expanding their education in fields deemed dead-ends in America (especially with the relevant costs in education, which are extensive and expensive), how does Gartner predict half of what they do in the first place: Tossing quarters and betting on heads rather than tails?
Posted by: HypnoToad72   Posted on: 05/30/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

20 hour week - thats what the new age economy demands  code_Warrior | 05/30/07
Also true, but managers are known for treating people like monkeys, cargo,  HypnoToad72 | 05/30/07
Load of crap...  aulax@... | 05/30/07
ya i agree with you..  jakex3@... | 05/30/07
I leave my Cell at home  voska | 05/30/07
you're the guy who works...  stevey_d | 05/30/07
Retain experienced workers?  HypnoToad72 | 05/30/07
Sounds like another wage to downsize wages and offload health care costs  ordaj@... | 05/30/07
I concure ... THIS is where that BELONGS! wink n/t  btljooz | 06/04/07
Yes, and no...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/30/07
Almost zero chance this will happen any time soon  Omch'Ar | 05/30/07
... could happen ...  Reverend MacFellow | 05/31/07
A different view  roberto_maietta@... | 05/31/07
and if you don't ?  magcomment | 05/31/07
Sorry, but CIO's and lower end supervisors aren't going to let this happen  maldain | 06/04/07
soo what your saying is..  Been_Done_Before | 05/31/07
... and we will vacation on the moon ...  Reverend MacFellow | 05/31/07
poppycock - or nothing new at all  shraven | 05/31/07
20 weeks  Silent Observer | 05/31/07
Who could afford it?  Marty R. Milette | 05/31/07
You better clue management in on this!  ejhonda | 05/31/07
Weren't they saying this in the 70's?  picklehead | 05/31/07
Doe these ppl research or just pull stuff out of their head?  btljooz | 06/04/07
aka "The Triple Revolution - A Letter To President Johnson" c. 1964  gardoglee | 06/04/07
Offshore workers will be happy with your job.  MV_z | 06/02/07
Hmmm...I'm having a 70s flashback here  suemac5 | 06/04/07
I concure n/t  btljooz | 06/04/07
IGNORE THE POST ABOVE. It belongs elsewhere plain  btljooz | 06/04/07
I had a job once that only required 40 hours/week.  stan@... | 06/04/07
Geez, did ANY of you actually READ the article?  1stcyberian | 06/04/07
As one of the more experienced workers,  stan@... | 06/04/07
Sure, and what are companies doing with experienced people?  caltinbay@... | 06/04/07
a.k.a. - the DEATH OF RETIREMENT  ig@... | 06/05/07
Halftime=halfpay?  shorty943@... | 06/04/07
you can't perform 40 hours a week  bcroner | 06/04/07
as long as there are computers  nix_hed | 06/05/07
goes with the PAPERLESS Office i presume  ig@... | 06/05/07
Out of step already  zclayton2 | 06/05/07
Nice idea, but in our lifetime?  johnnevin | 06/05/07
Not 20 hour work weeks  jfp | 06/19/07
It's about selfishness  THEE WOLF | 06/26/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here