On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 27:
Next »
« Previous
Damn Hollywood. Damn them to hell.
It's Hollywood that has gone and made everyone paranoid about these new technologies. God forbid we have the technology to do these things. Things that in our future will be paramount to our survival. You can't be a true objective scientist and be a bible-thumping christian at the same time. I have seen such "hybrids" before, and they are ridiculous. We know by the fact that carbon and radiactive materials decay over time we can figure out the age of things. Yet, some "SCIENTIST" like to think our WORLD has only been around 10,000 years. Umm, yeah. I guess everything we know is wrong. We can make computers and dvd players, fly to the moon, yet we're just too stupid and think we came from monkeys? I don't think so. What's often the case is that these people are ignorant to the facts.

Anyway. You shouldn't take Hollywood's scenarios to heart, because they are often not based in reality. For instance: cars will not explode if you shoot their gas tank, etc. Gasoline will not explode. It will just burn. That bus that jumped over the bridge in Speed.. yeah, that couldn't ever happen due to a thing called Gravity.

Ah it's such a shame. We have everything right except evolution etc!

Why not clone people? Or clone parts of people? Imagine: your liver fails.. so many people also need livers so there isn't one avaliable. But AHA! You cloned yourself (he's not "alive", not aware, etc) and you can take your brand spankin new liver and live happily ever-after.

Would a cloned person, i.e., a fully cloned person with a brain with higher functions, would this clone have a soul, if such a thing exists? How would you know? It walks, it talks, it craps and takes leaks, likes beer and porno, etc. What makes it different?

It's stupid movies like the Island and 6th Day that is gonna totally screw up this country. The religious fanatics are putting a limit on the knowledge we can attain.

Who say's we are "playing god"? Says you? I'm sorry, but I've never seen anytihng in the Bible that prohibits such things. We would be bettering ourselves.
Posted by: neophyte1   Posted on: 04/03/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Whoa!  Roger Ramjet | 11/07/05
No, no, no!  baggins_z | 11/07/05
Oh  Roger Ramjet | 11/07/05
No, Not Yeast, Tsa-Ey  panzrwagn | 11/07/05
Dr. Jekyll...beware!  techboy_z | 11/07/05
RE: "Dr. Jekyll...beware"  ajapierce | 11/07/05
If by Omish, you mean Amish...  John Le'Brecage | 11/07/05
Damn Hollywood. Damn them to hell.  neophyte1 | 04/03/06
Think again  HiRezL | 11/09/05
Inventing the Matrix  MacGeek2121 | 11/07/05
We Have It - Amazon; for now  TrustMe_z | 11/07/05
Message has been deleted.  Judas I. | 11/07/05
This makes me think of...  rapson | 11/07/05
A nice story  Roger Ramjet | 11/07/05
Cloning will be ok with RNP gene  TrustMe_z | 11/07/05
Self defeating  Roger Ramjet | 11/07/05
Only true, Roger, if the gene pool does NOT include ...  Judas I. | 11/07/05
Have to be more than one gene . . .  HiRezL | 11/09/05
splitting H2O  solson@... | 11/07/05
Ice IX  Roger Ramjet | 11/07/05
So, I should cash out my hamster stocks?  voice_of_all_reason | 11/07/05
Herr Doktor Frankenstein will create....  Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 11/07/05
Groan not another "innovator". Check out biodiesel algae on wikipedia  hipparchus2001 | 11/07/05
Go for it, produce away!  walterreads@... | 11/07/05
Does H2 escape the atmosphere?  __howard__ | 11/07/05
Not really.  neophyte1 | 04/03/06
Question: Can Water be synthetically created?  neophyte1 | 04/03/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc