Bloggers narrowly dodge federal crackdown

TalkBack 26 of 31:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

That is a conundrum now isn't it?

I will agree that there is far to much control of politicians by PACS and the George Soros of the world. However I must fall back on my right to privacey, freedom of speech and assembly arguments. Those freedoms apply to everyone no matter their financial status.

If I were to put a donation button on my website I would notify the donating public my intentions because of my own integrity. I cannot and will not agree that the government needs to be aware of yours mine or any privately held corporations donations.

Publicly traded corporations are an all together differenet matter. Why? Because of the word "public". The public should be notified where the corporations monies are being spent and to whom they are being donated.

The operative word in my argument is private as in private citizen, privately held business entities, private groups. The governemnt takes too many liberties with our privacies and I am actively against that.

Posted by: Squawkbox   Posted on: 03/26/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Healthcare CommunI.T. CDW Help build a stronger Healthcare CommunI.T. with technology from CDW ... Download Now
• More interoperability, plus 3 years Red Hat support, only from Novell Novell Save up to 50 percent on management costs by standardizing on the world's most interoperable Linux--plus enjoy 3 years of top-ranked Red Hat support. Download Now
• A Formal Performance Tuning Methodology: Wait-based Tuning Quest Software Are you effectively testing an application's performance BEFORE it reaches ... Download Now