Online politicking receives temporary reprieve

TalkBack 20 of 53:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Luv ya Spoon!

" the pictures posted show that the WTC has an external skeleton, while the other building has an internal skeleton."

The WTC towers has an exoskeleton AND a solid inner core, not one or the other. The Madrid building was a STEEL FRAMED BUILDING (just like the trade center) and yet the WTC towers were built much more solidly and yet fell from a much less of a fire than what ravaged the Madrid building. Of course the whole towere wasn't in a big red blaze the way the Mdrid building was..and yet the Madrid building still stands. Why? It should have fell in less than an hour, like its WTC counterpart, no?

"Never before in history has a large building been contructed in this way, so it isn't a stretch to believe it could fall differently."

And yet both towers were struck differently but fell almost the EXACT same way. This simply IS NOT POSSIBLE unless something was manipulated. This is just common sense. And remember: WTC 7 wasn't even hit, and yet fell perfectly SYMMETRICALLY, in the exact manner of a controlled demolition! And what do you make of Larry Silverstein ADMITTING that he blew up the building?!

"The third link is the clincher, Marvin's last name is Bush, he is the presidents brother, his company was in charge of security at the WTC, so that proves it beyond a reasonable doubt?"

No it just adds to the suspicion. You mean to tell me you wouldn't have become suspicious of Clinton if his brother was working security for the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City when the feds blew that one up too? Pleeeeeez..

"And the fourth link, Ohhhh, Alex Jones, now you're pulling out the big guns, film makers!"

I think Alex is a corny redneck, but at least he a lot more honest than any federal official has been. Did you take note of what he pointed out in the video clip, that only buildings owned by Sliverstein were destroyed, even when there were buildings much closer to the towers than WTC 7 was which DID NOT suffer significant damage and fall down?

"Would you say Alex is as credible as Michael Moore, or more or less credible?"

Can you PROVE to me that Alex Jones is full of crap? Can you PROVE to me that Mikey Moore is? Try this for me: PROVE to me that the claim that Osama bin Laden's family was flown out immediately after 9/11 is false. If you can't, then your "propaganda" claims are exactly what they are: crap.

"Here's one for you; who runs/owns that "what really happened" website?"

Michael Rivero. Now here's one for you: PROVE to me that what he puts up on his site is false. Start here:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/9-11BasicQuestions

If you can PROVE to me that some or all of the things on this page are false, I'll gladly accept what you have to say and never speak about 9/11 again. How's THAT for a challenge?

Posted by: Jeff Spicoli   Posted on: 03/24/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now
• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now