On CBS.com: Play Survivor Video Trivia Now
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 53:
Next »
« Previous
good one Squawky
"It amazes me that the First amendmant says in 45 words that I have the right to speak and express my views. Now there is a 47 page documnet (I refuse to do a word count) that seeks to modify and restrict (further) those rights."

Kind of reminds me of the Patriot Act. A piece of legislation that's over 1000 PAGES which we're supposed to believe was written in less than 45 days by the same group of losers that spent so much energy avoiding all the warnings of the impending 9/11 attack leading up to it. Of course one only need to think for 2 seconds to realize that there's no way they wrote this legislation (while "protecting" us from the terrorists and planning for the Iraq war crime at the same time) in those mere few days after 9/11. Yet another red flag which should make one be suspicious of the "official" 9/11 account as propagandized to us by the feds.
The purpose of making all this legislation so lengthy is to discourage thorough review. If a piece of legislation is only 2 pages, pretty much everyone would read it. If it's close to 50 pages or, say, 1000, you'll ward off pretty much everyone with an attention span of less than 10 seconds (basically yer average American).
Posted by: Jeff Spicoli   Posted on: 03/23/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Campaign finance laws are unconstitutional  Squawkbox | 03/23/05
good one Squawky  Jeff Spicoli | 03/23/05
We've had our disagreements  Squawkbox | 03/23/05
Is money speech?  John L. Ries | 03/23/05
No money is not speech  Squawkbox | 03/23/05
I think..  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
A little off here  rapson | 03/24/05
Is it really Carl?  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
Yes it is  rapson | 03/24/05
Ya know what the real problem is?  Squawkbox | 03/24/05
And why do you think that is?  rapson | 03/24/05
You're delusional Carl  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
Uhhhh, did YOU say facts?  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
BTW Jeff  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Dog gone it Carl  Squawkbox | 03/24/05
No Spoon  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
Squawk...  rapson | 03/24/05
Hey Squawky..  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
Where are your glasses Jeff?  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Luv ya Spoon!  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
Point  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Settle down Squawker!  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Did I misunderstand you  Squawkbox | 03/24/05
I'm not sure,  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
It's about time!  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Now all we need to wait for..  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
Curious as to one point  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
You're mssing it all like usual  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
And you dodge as usual  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
OK Spoon  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
Jeff  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Wow Spoon, you know NOTHING!  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
I stand corrected Jeff  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Spoon, try THINKING for a second please  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
Jeff, if your scenario happens...  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Re: No money is not speech  none none | 03/24/05
Good post  Squawkbox | 03/24/05
Had to read my 1st amendment right  osreinstall | 03/23/05
Ding Ding Ding  Squawkbox | 03/23/05
More like, BZZZZZZT !  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Not being flip here Spoon  Squawkbox | 03/24/05
I was looking at the word "individual"  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Do you see it differently?  Squawkbox | 03/24/05
Maybe the article was too vague  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Hey Spoon  Squawkbox | 03/24/05
Squawk, it is odd  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Thanks Spoon  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
Didn't mean it that way Jeff  Spoon Jabber | 03/24/05
Of course not Spoon  Jeff Spicoli | 03/24/05
No the sound was really like this:  osreinstall | 03/24/05
OOOOOLet's get the hell outta here!OOOOOOO  Squawkbox | 03/24/05
Yes politics are an ACME cartoon  osreinstall | 03/24/05
Hey Spoon and Jeff  Squawkbox | 03/24/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here