On CHOW: Outlawing workplace candy
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 24 of 34:
Next »
« Previous
Thank you toxic freak
I do find the blatant hypocrisy on the part of these childish phonies to be something of a spectacle. They are so criminal and so wrong on so many accounts, you just have to laugh when they take their usual moral high ground. They're perfectly OK with homosexuality when their own priests are doing it, but dead set against it if anyone else wants to get in on the action. They talk about unconditonal love, and yet place more conditions for being accepted than probably Hitler did. We "love" you "unconditionally" if you're a) not gay, b) not muslim, c)do not dare to acknowledge or practice other religions d) come to church religiously, e) don't question the bible, f) never challenge God to explain his precepts or actions, etc.
Personally, I had it with these losers once I saw how they reacted to the whole child molestation scandal that rocked the church a few years back. At first they were arrogant and disdainful, as though everyone else had some nerve butting in. Once they realized that the authorities were really going to go after them, they stonewalled, shifted, and lied as much as they possibly could. Piece of crap criminals and liars and bigots all those people really are.
Next time I'm in Canada I'll look you up. Always up for a good beer..:-)
Posted by: Jeff Spicoli   Posted on: 03/22/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

You should have the freedom to not see.  maxo_z | 03/21/05
Red Light Internet District  Martin Marvinski | 03/21/05
The movie industry  CobraA1 | 03/21/05
A great question, Cobra Commander  Jeff Spicoli | 03/22/05
Movie industry  compguy_z | 03/22/05
Pornography definition  Roger Ramjet | 03/22/05
Nope.. won't work.  slopoke | 03/22/05
Umm  Roger Ramjet | 03/23/05
pornography definition  compguy_z | 03/22/05
Illegal Porn  Roger Ramjet | 03/23/05
In the end it does not matter  voska | 03/22/05
PLEASE EVERYONE  mcplumber | 03/25/05
THIS IS INSANE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Protector | 03/22/05
Agreed  Jeff Spicoli | 03/22/05
Couldn't agree more!  TheCrow_z | 03/22/05
Whose job is this?  mobrien_12@... | 03/21/05
Valid concerns...  Martin Marvinski | 03/21/05
re  Trayk2 | 03/22/05
And who decides what goes on the list?  BitTwiddler | 03/22/05
Crusty codgers such as the Hatch ghoul  Jeff Spicoli | 03/22/05
Polygamy Websites Will Still Be Allowed  itanalyst | 03/22/05
BWAHAHAHA!!!  Jeff Spicoli | 03/22/05
man that one is so excellent  toxicfreak | 03/22/05
Thank you toxic freak  Jeff Spicoli | 03/22/05
Another moron showing his intelligence...  TechType | 03/22/05
Parents just need to do their jobs  Kerensky97 | 03/22/05
I doubt this is about kids  voska | 03/22/05
INSANE!!!!!!!!!!!!  Protector | 03/22/05
Should Be A Good Job wink  BlackDiamond | 03/22/05
I have a complaint to file  toomuchgreeatea@... | 03/22/05
another good reason to not vote republican (nt)  K B | 03/22/05
Not for the government to determine  drichards1953 | 03/22/05
You do realize that they can still view the sites  voska | 03/22/05
One Small Step for Judge, A Giant Step for Common  mcplumber | 03/25/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement