On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 29 of 42:
Next »
« Previous
Wish they'd call it W3C cohort pressure...
... in the title. Ceding the title "standards" to a group united by their opposition to a browser in 90% use is a hermetic definition.

And on the feature set, hard to accept that most of the world is slavering for tabbed browsing when it's widely available for IE as a free add-on.

Said it before, but... one thing I like about IE is how few features are included. I get to choose the ones I want. Yes, I know features can be turned off, but why have to bother?
Simplicity advantage to IE.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 03/17/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Microsoft needs to have IE only web sites though.  DonnieBoy | 03/16/05
I'll only migrate to Linux when...  voska | 03/16/05
But don't you get tired of Microsoft with their hand out?, the viruses?  DonnieBoy | 03/16/05
What?  NonZealot | 03/16/05
Most people pay for MS software, yes, fixes are free (if MS chooses to fix)  DonnieBoy | 03/16/05
Not a nice try  NonZealot | 03/16/05
Please do ignore Linux  Sunny Jalolly | 03/16/05
Ok, so you don't use AV, you never apply security patches??  DonnieBoy | 03/17/05
Again with the reading comprehension!  NonZealot | 03/17/05
Ok, we can all relax, MS does not and will not have security problems.  DonnieBoy | 03/17/05
What he said  voska | 03/17/05
Then they've already failed  John L. Ries | 03/16/05
Competitive markets  Real World | 03/17/05
MS doesn't make any money from IE  John L. Ries | 03/17/05
Yes, but it is very important for them to maintain 90% or more share.  DonnieBoy | 03/17/05
How much lock-in value does IE have?  John L. Ries | 03/17/05
Sure they do  Real World | 03/17/05
And the reduced numbers of IE only sites is why they are willing to  DonnieBoy | 03/17/05
What's a browser?  Anton Philidor | 03/17/05
I don't understand IE only sites  alterego_z | 03/17/05
Yes, but it was not that long ago, that it was less than 5%.  DonnieBoy | 03/17/05
Blatantly "innovating" Firefox's featureset into IE was inevitable  whisperycat | 03/17/05
Did you read your link?  Ardian Daka | 03/17/05
Yawn. Another lame argument  billywill | 03/17/05
Be nice to jellyclock  NonZealot | 03/17/05
You should..  Jeff Spicoli | 03/17/05
Look Who's Talking ... Now !  Ardian Daka | 03/17/05
I'm talking, Mo Frare!  Jeff Spicoli | 03/17/05
Wish they'd call it W3C cohort pressure...  Anton Philidor | 03/17/05
Would you prefer they cede to standards like ISO and ECMA?  B.O.F.H. | 03/17/05
Promise we won't argue about punctuation?  Anton Philidor | 03/17/05
But Anty..  Jeff Spicoli | 03/17/05
So, no FireFox "advantage" in features.  Anton Philidor | 03/17/05
Spicoli Lied  nucrash | 03/17/05
Needing to put words in peoples' mouths a sure sign of..  Jeff Spicoli | 03/17/05
Featuring...  Anton Philidor | 03/17/05
Some users just like old technolgy!  B.O.F.H. | 03/17/05
Tabbed Broswing?  jfreedle2@... | 03/17/05
Darn, source close to MS, . . guess that means lawsuit  FilledOut | 03/18/05
This thing is going to follow Standards?  tor2351@... | 12/23/05
This thing is going to follow Standards?  tor2351@... | 12/23/05
This thing is going to follow Standards?  tor2351@... | 12/23/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads