On BNET: 5 classic computer pranks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 38:
Next »
« Previous
Sorry, Anton
but Active X is proprietary code.

It may have a use in a corporate setting, although I can not figure out what, but it breaks interoperability, which makes it useless for the WEB.
Posted by: Update victim   Posted on: 03/16/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I might add  rapson | 03/16/05
And in fairness, Acid2 should include ActiveX controls...  Anton Philidor | 03/16/05
contradiction there Mr. Microshill  Jeff Spicoli | 03/16/05
Okay, subordinate Microsoft to 90% of browsers...  Anton Philidor | 03/16/05
There is NO SUBORDINATION! Get over it!  Jeff Spicoli | 03/16/05
If "most everyone" is the standard of measure...  Anton Philidor | 03/16/05
Anton, you let your worship of the almighty dollar ...  Judas I. | 03/16/05
Time to Cry Monopoly  nucrash | 03/17/05
Standards and progress.  seosamh_z | 03/16/05
Oh..  Jeff Spicoli | 03/16/05
You really are a t*t.  seosamh_z | 03/17/05
ActiveX  Harry Bardal | 03/16/05
I disagree  rapson | 03/16/05
Difference  Anton Philidor | 03/16/05
But ActiveX  IT_User | 03/16/05
If you choose to leave out ActiveX...  Anton Philidor | 03/16/05
Are there other aspects  IT_User | 03/16/05
Nice Troll...  Patrick Jones | 03/16/05
I prefer, hoist with their own petard.  Anton Philidor | 03/16/05
Simple answer to clear up your delusions  Jeff Spicoli | 03/16/05
Ah, ActiveX...  Yen_z | 03/16/05
Sorry, Anton  Update victim | 03/16/05
ActiveX is a security nightmare!  B.O.F.H. | 03/16/05
You raise a worthwhile point.  Anton Philidor | 03/17/05
so they've already got our money  bthomasmo@... | 03/16/05
Yup  Jeff Spicoli | 03/16/05
Read As...  BitTwiddler | 03/16/05
Ouch!  Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/16/05
Maybe MS will finally get a nightly build team  FilledOut | 03/16/05
A major misstatement  Roger Ramjet | 03/16/05
Good catch  rapson | 03/16/05
Why does MS have to be open compliant  osreinstall | 03/16/05
We have been.  nucrash | 03/17/05
Not That  osreinstall | 03/17/05
Nothing more or less?  rapson | 03/17/05
Nope Maybe  osreinstall | 03/17/05
I guess I don't see it  rapson | 03/18/05
I read more into it  osreinstall | 03/18/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement