It would be nice to use existing technology, but
bjbrock | 03/11/05
|
 
BJBrock is correct
whisperycat | 03/11/05
|
|
How About A Discussion On BPL?
itanalyst | 03/11/05
|
|
Utility? For whom?
Eggs Ackley_z | 03/11/05
|
|
The problem is, one company wants proprietary power plants and transmission
DonnieBoy | 03/11/05
|
|
Yeah, IT "flows" like a coked up elephant on roller skates!
Jeff Spicoli | 03/11/05
|
|
Prove it.
Anton Philidor | 03/11/05
|
|
Good points
IT Scion | 03/11/05
|
|
What? You need to prove that we need general computing capacity????
DonnieBoy | 03/11/05
|
Rather have your software on your own computer...
Anton Philidor | 03/11/05
|
|
At one time, people thought they needed their own generator too.
DonnieBoy | 03/11/05
|
|
Raw computing power and storage can be a comodity.
DonnieBoy | 03/11/05
|
|
Software is not a commodity if a single major company...
Anton Philidor | 03/11/05
|
|
Yes, Microsoft likes the idea of utility computing, as long as,
DonnieBoy | 03/12/05
|
|
This has always been a bad...
wizzzer | 03/11/05
|
|
It has always been a very good analogy.
DonnieBoy | 03/11/05
|
|
This has always been a bad...
wizzzer | 03/11/05
|
|
I think..
IT Scion | 03/11/05
|
|
Complicated explaination of a network computer
osreinstall | 03/13/05
|
|
Nothing new
scotth_z | 03/20/05
|
|
Be Careful What You Wish For
powerindustry | 04/22/05
|
Doc delivers the scoop on today's enterprise content management, printer maintenance, and all other issues related to document management. It's the DocuMentor Blog.
When you transition from your existing Red Hat environment to SUSE Linux Enterprise from Novell, you can recognize dramatic cost savings, perhaps as much 50%
