On The Insider: Chris Brown Reacts to Rihanna Interview
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 21:
Next »
« Previous
why not sue the..
organizations that are supposedly distributing rights to material they dont own? If I were to create an organizaton such as lets say the Multimedia Managment Association of America (MMAA) and started selling distribution rights to various popular movies and songs, would I not be legally liable? Of course I would. So why arn't these fradulent groups being sued, only the end content sellers?
Posted by: zijiang   Posted on: 03/07/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Pursuing a dead case is kind of a waste of time  voska | 03/07/05
I think they will push for change in law...  cjules13 | 03/07/05
Letter of the law versus the spirit of the law  tic swayback | 03/07/05
They're legal in Russia  Michael Kelly | 03/07/05
Still a grey area  tic swayback | 03/07/05
From what I've found, downloading isn't importing  voska | 03/08/05
Here's a better explanation  tic swayback | 03/08/05
why not sue the..  zijiang | 03/07/05
They would be stupid to sue  voska | 03/07/05
Let me guess - $0.05 per MB ...  Vily Clay | 03/07/05
Sort of  tic swayback | 03/07/05
Tic - 14 years?  jezter~ | 03/08/05
Means of persuasion  tic swayback | 03/08/05
14 years may be short but unused works  maxo_z | 03/08/05
14 Years I think is fine  voska | 03/08/05
Better suggestion  tic swayback | 03/08/05
But does that benifit society in general?  voska | 03/08/05
Limited monopoly  tic swayback | 03/08/05
How many here believes only the Police State will save artists?  Vily Clay | 03/08/05
too long  twinkler@... | 03/08/05
Music company is being sued for failure to pay royalties again  twinkler@... | 03/08/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here