On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 10:
Next »
« Previous
Does "redundancy" mean anything to you?
It may be 10x the reliability than an *individual* PC, but not thousands. The very reason for this many is that if one fails, another can take its place with no downtime. Overall, the entire network of PCs is 100x more reliable than the mainframe.
Posted by: CobraA1   Posted on: 05/06/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I wonder what they use for the desktop  Arrg | 03/03/05
RE: I wonder what they use for the desktop  rhavyn | 03/03/05
Smart Idea!  BitTwiddler | 03/03/05
RE: Smart Idea!  rhavyn | 03/03/05
Downloadable links for GFS and Mapreduce papers  David Mohring | 03/03/05
I would have to say  Linux User 147560 | 03/03/05
Using Cheap Equipment, aka massively parallel computers  smfriedland | 03/06/05
Time for a MainFrame  Fraumann | 03/07/05
Does "redundancy" mean anything to you?  CobraA1 | 05/06/05
Redundancy adds Complexity  Fraumann | 08/14/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc