On MovieTome: Pixar's new film has characters from Up
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 24:
Next »
« Previous
My guess
My view is that society in general doesn't see software as a product in which flaws could actually harm them. Sure, it's a hassle to have to clean malware off your system or reboot to install new software, but the bottom line is, most people outside of technophiles don't really care that much (an attitude which, I think, drives technophiles crazy). The computer is just a machine, not a necessity. If it doesn't work, turn it off. Very few lives are actually dependent on a properly working computer, and in those cases where lives are at stake you'll notice that flawed software is rarely used. There's a reason why Windows isn't used in critical systems (by anyone who knows better), and when it has been there have been problems.

The only real harm that can occur, identity theft, is almost always caused by user ignorance, not software flaws. It's just that more 'ignorant' users use Windows than any other OS, so it seems like Windows is at fault.

"Would ANYONE buy a car that hasn't been fully tested? Would anyone buy a baby stroller or car seat that hasn't been tested?"

These are items in which flaws can directly harm people. Faulty brakes, for example, can kill the driver and/or others. Faulty car seats and baby strollers can seriously harm children. What harm does a bug in a spreadsheet program cause? What harm does spyware actually cause, beyond inconvenience?

Now, maybe if computers become as pervasive in our lives as those in futuristic programs such as 'Star Trek', people will feel differently. But that won't happen until software (and computers in general) goes through some massive changes. Even Linux is nowhere near ready for that kind of role.

Carl Rapson
Posted by: rapson   Posted on: 02/11/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I prefer the longer beta of the crappier software  nucrash | 02/11/05
RE: I prefer the longer beta of the crappier software  richdave | 02/11/05
what does that have to do with anything?  doh123 | 02/11/05
yes, but some companies take it too far  JasonL31 | 02/11/05
nucrash i hear ya on the cell but i don't see it happening  liskanich | 02/11/05
cell cont  liskanich | 02/11/05
Intel cheap compared to sony??  hipparchus2000 | 02/11/05
Society's mentality  Joe Blow_z | 02/11/05
My guess  rapson | 02/11/05
Excellent comment  Michael Kelly | 02/11/05
Mostly agree  rapson | 02/11/05
longer beta = Bigger price  liskanich | 02/11/05
Cars and other complex systems  maxo_z | 02/11/05
Make up your minds...  ejhonda | 02/11/05
What?????  Mack DaNife | 02/14/05
They Are Just Following Microsoft's Example  itanalyst | 02/11/05
Wow! That was really original!  Salman Pak | 02/11/05
Not Trying To Be Original, Just Being Honest  itanalyst | 02/11/05
longer beata would mean higher price not rocket science  liskanich | 02/11/05
Hence The Reason Why Many Abandon Windows For Linux  itanalyst | 02/11/05
Makes them look lazy and non-confident  MIS Master | 02/11/05
At least they are honest and call it a beta. Microsoft quality is lower and  DonnieBoy | 02/11/05
Funny how there is no mention of the longest beta so far that I know of...  Confused by religion | 02/11/05
RE: A long winding road out of beta  austin672 | 10/24/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here