On CHOW: Should you treat your jobless friends?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 23 of 69:
Next »
« Previous
Isn't that what courts do?
---Although now, in this case, you indicate that the two are inextricably linked.---

I don't know if the two issues are inextricably linked in general, but they both are addressed by this case in particular.

---The scenarios you mentioned, secret mission etc, do not require giving up your anonimity, as there are ways to travel other than a plane. Now if your mission was top secret, why in the world, knowing that you will have to produce ID, would you not find a more anonymous means of transportation?---

But why should you have to do this? Why be inconvenienced for no reason at all? Why be restricted for no reason at all?

---You mention a slippery slope, what kind of slope would there be if anyone, including wanted criminals, convicted child molesters and the like, were allowed to travel anonymously along with unknowing citizens on a plane?---

Uh, both of those things happen every day. There's no law saying a convicted child molester, once released from prison, can't travel on a plane. And I don't believe that's the sort of profiling the TSA is doing with their lists of names.

---What if one of these characters stole your plane ticket, or pretended to be you when purchasing the ticket, and used the opportunity to commit a crime, afterall your name is on the ticket.----

That's exactly the point. The real criminal/terrorist will find obtaining a fake ID to be no hurdle at all. It does nothing to curtail their activities. The only people hurt are law abiding citizens without government ID, law abiding citizens whose ID is stolen, people concerned with privacy, and apparently people who happen to have the same name as someone on the no-fly list. Requiring ID does absolutely no good whatsoever. More on this here:
http://www.papersplease.org/gilmore/id.html

---If a person doesn't have ID then I refer you back to the vagrancy laws, nothing secret there---

Can you point me to some specific laws? I find it confusing, in that we don't have a national ID card required by law, yet we insist on everyone having some sort of ID. Which is it? Am I required by law to have government issued identification on my person at all times? Isn't that the first step towards a more authoritarian system? Then you put an RFID tag in each one....

--- What benefit to the authorities would a secret law have, especially when there are "unsecret" laws that serve the exact same purpose?---

A great question. Why refuse to reveal a law that everyone knows about, or is told about by airline officials? We all know we have to show ID at the airport, why not admit there's a law? Why the secrecy?

---Possibly, but I see him as making a mockery out of the legal system---

I don't think he's out to mock anything. The whole case is being handled very seriously and is attracting support from many groups. He is not doing this as a joke. He's using the system as it's meant to be used. He perceives an injustice and is trying to work within the system to correct it. He may or may not be right, but that's what we're supposed to do as Americans. It's our right and our obligation.

---I also don't believe that "open to interpretation" is a good way to describe the upholding of the constitution---

Isn't that what the Supreme Court does with nearly every decision they make? Don't courts constantly rule on the constitutionality of new laws? Doesn't that require interpretation of the Constitution?

Let me know what your research turns up, I think this is a fascinating case and would love to learn more.

I know it gets over-used, but this quote is particularly apt here:

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Posted by: tic swayback   Posted on: 02/11/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Not that I like the EU or anything..  Jeff Spicoli | 02/08/05
Socialistic is not free?  FirstNLastN | 02/08/05
What's that all a'boot  LinuxHippie | 02/08/05
Income tax isn't that bad  voska | 02/08/05
Not to tempt Godwin . . .  Roger Ramjet | 02/09/05
Actually "Propaganda" is Latin  osreinstall | 02/12/05
I would have to say that most of the rest of the World  bjbrock | 02/09/05
"hollow observation"  Spoon Jabber | 02/09/05
Here in Canada...  voska | 02/09/05
You call that "tamer"?  Spoon Jabber | 02/10/05
Here's one  tic swayback | 02/09/05
Tic, change your name!  Spoon Jabber | 02/10/05
I don't want to Godwin this thread....  tic swayback | 02/10/05
No loss at all  Spoon Jabber | 02/10/05
Gilmore V. Ashcroft  tic swayback | 02/10/05
Interesting  Spoon Jabber | 02/10/05
Keep an open mind Spoon  tic swayback | 02/10/05
I'm trying to  Spoon Jabber | 02/10/05
The Constitution is trivial?  tic swayback | 02/10/05
Maybe I'm simple minded, but...  Spoon Jabber | 02/10/05
Two separate issues here  tic swayback | 02/10/05
I'll give you that  Spoon Jabber | 02/11/05
Isn't that what courts do?  tic swayback | 02/11/05
It is very clear  Spoon Jabber | 02/11/05
Thanks Spoon  tic swayback | 02/11/05
LOL! A blanket....that's great!  Spoon Jabber | 02/11/05
Wow, check this out tic  Spoon Jabber | 02/11/05
So the MPAA and cohorts...  The King's Servant | 02/08/05
Wow! Once again  Linux User 147560 | 02/08/05
Gee, you mean the crooks don't want to be caught...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/08/05
Catch all the crooks you want...  tic swayback | 02/08/05
What's criminal?  voska | 02/08/05
Simple solution  NonZealot | 02/08/05
Driving customers to illegal services  tic swayback | 02/08/05
I buy DRM music  voska | 02/08/05
So they're competing against themselves  tic swayback | 02/08/05
I'm a collector  voska | 02/08/05
And you're being punished for being a loyal customer  tic swayback | 02/08/05
There's always a way  Spoon Jabber | 02/09/05
Again Spoon, you're being punished for paying  tic swayback | 02/09/05
You are right tic  Spoon Jabber | 02/10/05
Then support measures to stop the criminals  NonZealot | 02/08/05
Not according to what's happened  tic swayback | 02/08/05
Give it time  NonZealot | 02/08/05
Muscular Mice  tic swayback | 02/08/05
They started when file-sharing was the only way...  Anton Philidor | 02/08/05
I thouht it was pretty clear  voska | 02/08/05
Perfect!  NonZealot | 02/08/05
You know I think this illustrates something  voska | 02/08/05
Creepy  NonZealot | 02/08/05
All these years and the perfect analogy was right there  voska | 02/08/05
Huh?  tic swayback | 02/08/05
Maybe you are right  NonZealot | 02/08/05
Heard of being Borked?  Anton Philidor | 02/08/05
Just for viewing an "R" rated film?  voska | 02/08/05
Not al all  seosamh_z | 02/09/05
NO! Innocent people don't want to give  bjbrock | 02/09/05
Horror of horrors!  NonZealot | 02/08/05
So we should just all turn over our PI  voska | 02/08/05
Email me regarding bridge  NonZealot | 02/08/05
They can have my preferences if they pay me for it  voska | 02/08/05
Where do you draw the line?  tic swayback | 02/08/05
It would be the perfect defence, and lawsuit  NonZealot | 02/08/05
Two wrongs don't make a right  tic swayback | 02/08/05
Every time you buy something...  ShadeTree | 02/09/05
But you get rewards with your credit card  voska | 02/09/05
How does DRM do this?  tic swayback | 02/08/05
EU Freedom  alxnsc@... | 02/09/05
Ain't International inconsistancy in law strictness fun?  GreatInca | 02/09/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More