On CHOW: Cookbooks make great gifts
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 10:
Next »
« Previous
Weird
...by extension, this means that Google couldn't sell sidebar adspace for people who search on Microsoft, or "Sun Microsystems", or Oracle. I don't see why that's useful.

Why does the fact that you have a business name mean that own the right to link ads to searches for that business name?
Posted by: John Carroll   Posted on: 01/20/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

How should Google respond?  Letophoro | 01/20/05
Now, let's not be subjective  quietLee | 01/20/05
Why not leave France?, Or hash it  Nigel Johnstone | 01/20/05
Weird  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 01/20/05
Here's another way of looking at it.  Taz_z | 01/21/05
I can see the court's point  Roger Ramjet | 01/21/05
It's about ads.  doe_z | 01/21/05
Ma  pvn | 01/25/05
Make "Equivalent" a "Default" Option  pvn | 01/25/05
translation of the court order  fglaize | 01/25/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads