On TV.com: Texting with KIM KARDASHIAN
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 18 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Carl, notice...
How all the posts come to a grinding halt on this when real issues and facts are laid on the table and people are forced to understand not all software patents are a bad thing and restricted to "big, evil corporations".

Heck, even Linus T. agrees there are reasons to have pantents on software...
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 12/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

MS should win this on appeal  Robertbrice | 12/09/04
I'm split  Roger Ramjet | 12/10/04
The first time's the hardest  rapson | 12/10/04
But MS is not out of the woods...  nomorems | 12/10/04
What a plain silly post...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Software Shouldn't Be Patentable  Kamikaze_Ohka | 12/10/04
I Agree...  IT_Critic | 12/10/04
That should have been...  IT_Critic | 12/10/04
Yes and no  rapson | 12/10/04
Dead on  IT Scion | 12/10/04
Yes, patents protect large corporations...  Anton Philidor | 12/10/04
The little guy  tic swayback | 12/10/04
The problem with your argument.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Technological Development.  Kamikaze_Ohka | 12/10/04
Hmmm, sounds like your upset about open source...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Why doesn't copyright also stifle innovation?  rapson | 12/10/04
You are 100% spot on. Copyright is meaningless to software.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Carl, notice...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
So what's your take on this?  Taz_z | 10/31/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc