On mySimon: Three Colors Trilogy
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Technological Development.
Patents applied to software will stifle technological development in the US. The main application of this is in new technologies and emerging technologies, to which open source software can be easily adapted, as it is open and out there and therefore easy to modify and build with and upon. The small guy can change direction rapidly, keep abreast of the latest changes, stay dynamic - he's not under the pressure of the market like the big players are. Enter the patent in the hands of the big player. Now the big player can stop the development of the small guy, can stifle his dynamic advantage, with threats of litigation. Meanwhile, the big guy continues on his plodding way, slowly adapting to trends and stifling new technology development and release until the big guy is well positioned to maximize his profit from the new technology. A good example of this is with hardware - new developments aren't released any time near when they are developed, and new models are released in waves, 1.8 GHz proc., 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 2.6, 2.8, 3.0 etc. etc. The hope is that the consumer will buy each one and then upgrade to the next when it comes out, maximizing profits. When really, the 3.0 could have just been released and sold for a fair profit. MS does this with their software as well, and they are now focusing on patenting everything in sight, in order to cemet their lock-hold on the software industry. So we're trading technological stagnation for big profit by big business. Who suffers? The consumer, and the country. Come the judgment day, there won't be any trumpets blowing, boys.
Posted by: Kamikaze_Ohka   Posted on: 12/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

MS should win this on appeal  Robertbrice | 12/09/04
I'm split  Roger Ramjet | 12/10/04
The first time's the hardest  rapson | 12/10/04
But MS is not out of the woods...  nomorems | 12/10/04
What a plain silly post...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Software Shouldn't Be Patentable  Kamikaze_Ohka | 12/10/04
I Agree...  IT_Critic | 12/10/04
That should have been...  IT_Critic | 12/10/04
Yes and no  rapson | 12/10/04
Dead on  IT Scion | 12/10/04
Yes, patents protect large corporations...  Anton Philidor | 12/10/04
The little guy  tic swayback | 12/10/04
The problem with your argument.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Technological Development.  Kamikaze_Ohka | 12/10/04
Hmmm, sounds like your upset about open source...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Why doesn't copyright also stifle innovation?  rapson | 12/10/04
You are 100% spot on. Copyright is meaningless to software.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Carl, notice...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
So what's your take on this?  Taz_z | 10/31/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here