On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Yes, patents protect large corporations...
... from being sued and they also are resources in negotiations among corporations.
But they also are a way of controlling the market, and any large company would be foolish to miss that chance. I believe another article here observed that a large company (not Microsoft) has been submitting 11 patent applications a day. Any company that didn't care about patents in the past has come to understand their importance.

I think the patent office will have a difficult time identifying prior art and determining what's original. To date, they have erred on the side of not rejecting applications, but that may change. There's as much danger on the other side; some people seem to think that any logical consequence of an idea cannot be a new idea. That would make just about nothing patentable.
The courts and administrators may need another 20 years to reach an efficient approach.

But that effort is worth it.
The US is a country whose main product (aside from person to person services) is going to be IP. Doesn't mean manufacturing is gone, but, like farming, it will be far from a major employer countrywide.
IP is worthless unless it generates revenue.
Patents are a good way to generate revenue from IP.
Therefore, patents, including software patents, are an essential part of the US economy.
As a consequence, it's going to be necessary for the US government to push hard for enforcement of IP rights (including copyright) whenever and wherever possible.

If you start from wanting the greatest good for the greatest number of people, you have to favor software patents. And endure all the messiness that follows from that conclusion.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 12/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

MS should win this on appeal  Robertbrice | 12/09/04
I'm split  Roger Ramjet | 12/10/04
The first time's the hardest  rapson | 12/10/04
But MS is not out of the woods...  nomorems | 12/10/04
What a plain silly post...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Software Shouldn't Be Patentable  Kamikaze_Ohka | 12/10/04
I Agree...  IT_Critic | 12/10/04
That should have been...  IT_Critic | 12/10/04
Yes and no  rapson | 12/10/04
Dead on  IT Scion | 12/10/04
Yes, patents protect large corporations...  Anton Philidor | 12/10/04
The little guy  tic swayback | 12/10/04
The problem with your argument.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Technological Development.  Kamikaze_Ohka | 12/10/04
Hmmm, sounds like your upset about open source...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Why doesn't copyright also stifle innovation?  rapson | 12/10/04
You are 100% spot on. Copyright is meaningless to software.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
Carl, notice...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/10/04
So what's your take on this?  Taz_z | 10/31/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and