Uh Oh, a judge that wants real facts.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|

the real facts
JasonL31 | 12/02/04
|
 
Exactly..
d_jedi | 12/02/04
|
 
See my reply below. (nt)
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
 
Would it not be simpler
voska | 12/02/04
|
  
Even easier
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|

bitty's use of the word 'fact' is contrary to actual meaning
AmusedAtItAll | 12/03/04
|
Just out of curiosity, suppose I already own the music...
el1jones | 12/02/04
|

download is not the problem
JasonL31 | 12/02/04
|
 
Sorry, you are wrong.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
  
That brings up a question..
Patrick Jones | 12/02/04
|
   
I would say no, but hard to tell.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
    
Doesn't make a differnce
voska | 12/02/04
|
     
And that was my point.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
     
Secondary infringement?
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
     
Secondary infringement
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
     
That was my question tic:
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
     
Open questions
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
   
And I thought only US Courts were unfair
Joe Blow_z | 12/02/04
|
    
Huh? Why go through it.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
  
No evidence of that
amicus_curious | 12/02/04
|
   
In support of your argument.
Letophoro | 12/02/04
|
   
You had to follow the case.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
    
Ahh, but it is legal.
Letophoro | 12/02/04
|
     
If I recall
rapson | 12/02/04
|
     
But...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
     
That is true for Canada
amicus_curious | 12/02/04
|
     
Not really legal in Canada
voska | 12/02/04
|
     
What's legal in Canada?
d_jedi | 12/02/04
|
     
While you are right it's not be decided
voska | 12/02/04
|
     
Re: voska
d_jedi | 12/02/04
|
     
I agree
voska | 12/03/04
|
    
You mean download can be illegal
voska | 12/02/04
|
     
I am questioning that. See my post below.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
     
That's why this need to settle in front of judge
voska | 12/02/04
|
    
I DID follow the cases
AbsolutelyNot | 12/02/04
|
     
Not what has been widely reported in the news.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
     
Downloading is probably illegal
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
     
Charged
AbsolutelyNot | 12/02/04
|
     
Afraid not Diva...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
    
It isn't the same
mds_z | 12/03/04
|
    
Not at all
AmusedAtItAll | 12/03/04
|
  
Interesting implications
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
   
My understanding is...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
    
Forensics?
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
   
resonable doubt is not a factor in civil cases
voska | 12/02/04
|
    
I'm still confused
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
     
Weight of the evidence
amicus_curious | 12/02/04
|
     
When I was studying law
voska | 12/03/04
|
  
bitty again confuses fact with fluff.
AmusedAtItAll | 12/03/04
|

okay, let me simplify the idea I'm getting at...
el1jones | 12/02/04
|
 
How did you send it to your PC?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
 
Fair use allows this
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|

Broken Record, Tape, CD
GregSalts | 12/02/04
|
 
Not legally...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
  
Sorry, you're wrong
mds_z | 12/03/04
|
   
Grey areas
tic swayback | 12/03/04
|
  
Try again, bitty
AmusedAtItAll | 12/03/04
|
 
Depends on who you ask
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
ok - why is the media copany not hiring them then?
JasonL31 | 12/02/04
|

Legal questions stopping them?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
 
AHA!
AbsolutelyNot | 12/02/04
|
  
Hmmm, possibly...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
   
Like most EULAs seem to subvert existing laws? (NT)
mds_z | 12/03/04
|
 
Re: Legal questions stopping them?
none none | 12/02/04
|
 
so what your are saying is
JasonL31 | 12/03/04
|
What needs to be done
Roger Ramjet | 12/02/04
|
A question about "altered" music and copyright.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|

No takers? (nt)
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
 
I'm not going to touch this one...
d_jedi | 12/02/04
|

A song is a song
Been_Done_Before | 12/02/04
|
 
You missed my question,
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
  
No.
amicus_curious | 12/02/04
|
   
How do you know what a jury would say?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
    
Infringement is different from theft
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
     
Are you confused?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
     
Ax, You strongly imply theft it by your analogy (NT)
mds_z | 12/03/04
|
     
Is this any differnt than an FTP or Web server?
voska | 12/03/04
|
     
No Ax--not confused, but looking for clarification
tic swayback | 12/03/04
|
     
How is this any differnt than....
voska | 12/03/04
|
    
You must be a history major!
amicus_curious | 12/02/04
|
     
Well, let's chech your law degree, ok.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
     
Well??? No reply?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/03/04
|
    
Not quite that simple
mds_z | 12/03/04
|
    
Stealing or infringing
GregSalts | 12/03/04
|
  
that would be a differnt format
JasonL31 | 12/03/04
|

Alterations
AbsolutelyNot | 12/02/04
|
 
Of course it alters the original IP.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
  
Not really
AbsolutelyNot | 12/02/04
|
   
Not according to the law.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
    
Um...
AbsolutelyNot | 12/02/04
|
     
Talk about obtuse...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
    
I think what she meant was...
Spoon Jabber | 12/03/04
|
  
I understand why the media companies would want to
JasonL31 | 12/03/04
|
 
The RIAA says this is illegal
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
  
This another case of differing opinions
voska | 12/02/04
|
   
Isn't that about to happen? (nt)
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
    
I hope so but we all know how civil cases go
voska | 12/03/04
|

Perfectly legal to compress music
GregSalts | 12/02/04
|
 
I have a problem with that too
tic swayback | 12/02/04
|
  
My problem with the quote
none none | 12/03/04
|
 
Ummm, are you distributing it or not.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
  
that is correct
JasonL31 | 12/03/04
|

Software installs addressed this
Robert Crocker | 12/02/04
|
 
Again, your talking about personal use. Not distribution. (nt)
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
  
Then get the herring out of your argument
Robert Crocker | 12/03/04
|
   
Sorry Robert, there were two specific conditions.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/03/04
|
    
They're not related conditions
Robert Crocker | 12/03/04
|
  
this would not even be a issue
JasonL31 | 12/03/04
|
Questions for Sharmann....
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|

IP violation comes to mind
AbsolutelyNot | 12/02/04
|
 
Not according to the testimoney.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|

I think you know why. $$$$
voska | 12/02/04
|
 
Spot on!!! No it's not for the "users" benefit.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
  
I can't say I'm blind here
voska | 12/02/04
|

Copyright infingement ID'ing
Robert Crocker | 12/02/04
|
 
I can name that tune in 6 notes!
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
  
It's not a tangent
Robert Crocker | 12/03/04
|

I?ll take a shot at your questions!
B.O.F.H. | 12/02/04
|
 
And both fail the common sense test.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/02/04
|
  
Re: And both fail the common sense test.
none none | 12/02/04
|
  
Don't understand what a "tax haven" is?
B.O.F.H. | 12/02/04
|
   
Such a nice try...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/03/04
|
    
My assertions are backed by technical analysis and history!
B.O.F.H. | 12/03/04
|
  
wow
JasonL31 | 12/03/04
|
 
Re: I?ll take a shot at your questions!
none none | 12/02/04
|
  
"they" is 1 woman (and no one else).
B.O.F.H. | 12/02/04
|

Re: Questions for Sharmann....
none none | 12/02/04
|

Sherman has no obligation to monitor
Root User | 12/02/04
|
 
They may not have to
voska | 12/03/04
|
 
Pardon me... That's what this case is all about.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/03/04
|
 
Oh, the irony!
tic swayback | 12/03/04
|
  
Re: Oh, the irony!
none none | 12/03/04
|
  
Simple answer Tic:
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/03/04
|
   
Guess it depends on whether you like the law, huh?
tic swayback | 12/03/04
|
OK.... One more time for the cheap seats...
SysAn63 | 12/03/04
|

Ah, so that's your excuse, the other guy did it?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/03/04
|
 
Hi point is largely irrelevant to this discussion
voska | 12/03/04
|