On MovieTome: Why you didn't see Shatner in TREK
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 25 of 38:
Next »
« Previous
I oversimplified.
I wrote:
I don't care how long the copyright can extend.

You're right. I do care. I think the current duration is absurd.

I was thinking about the context. From the way I read the recent Supreme Court ruling, a copyright can last a million years, and as long as Congress passes a law specifying exactly 1,000,000 years, it's valid.
So, my statement was intended to imply that I wasn't trying to change the Court decision. Only to get more works that no one wanted to keep under copyright into the public domain. As it stands now, every work is protected for the maximum duration. Why not at least reduce the number of works withheld? Half a loaf...


Where I disagree with you is when you said:
You really can't argue that the public domain is [not] the place where the most innovation can happen, since there's no restrictions there. Anyone can innovate freely once the work is in the public domain, but while a copyright exists only the copyright holder can innovate.

"Innovate" is a loaded word, and without reading the other posts (yet) I expect that No_Ax is appreciating the detonation.
I'll just point out that works/ideas that are the property of another can still be used. There just has to be proper recompense, anything from money to citation.
The proper discussion on this topic is about the risk of the property holder refusing to give permission for use.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 11/25/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

When will they ever learn...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/24/04
What's that have to do keeping hands off?  voska | 11/24/04
Not when they want to publish out of date works.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/24/04
If the works are archived, they're available.  Anton Philidor | 11/24/04
The answer is easy...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/24/04
Yes, but...  John L. Ries | 11/24/04
my library archives newspapers and allows the public to see them  JasonL31 | 11/26/04
I'd say it depends on the reasons  voska | 11/25/04
C'mon man, stay on topic!  BitTwiddler | 11/24/04
Hmmm, you are the only one that said thief.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/24/04
HAHA! Good one! (NT)  NonZealot | 11/24/04
Not exactly true, bitty  AmusedAtItAll | 11/27/04
My Goodness Bitty...  eulagree | 11/29/04
The interesting issue: when should copyright lapse?  Anton Philidor | 11/24/04
I agree on reform for the length.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/24/04
true  JasonL31 | 11/26/04
Make it an economic decision...  Root User | 11/24/04
Why so complicated?  Anton Philidor | 11/24/04
..because the Public Domain is where all ideas end up  Root User | 11/24/04
Stop right there!!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/25/04
Copy? Who says anything about copying?  Root User | 11/25/04
Excellent points  voska | 11/25/04
Voska, you might think about...  Anton Philidor | 11/25/04
Re: Voska, you might think about...  Root User | 11/25/04
I oversimplified.  Anton Philidor | 11/25/04
Only one real problem with this  bidemytime | 11/29/04
LoL.  ParadigmOdyssey | 11/29/04
Simple  bidemytime | 11/29/04
Interesting that ths was even tried  John L. Ries | 11/24/04
well duh  JasonL31 | 11/25/04
Somethning very interesting in these posts.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/25/04
I'm not against the idea of software patents  voska | 11/25/04
I don't think it is always as simple as that.  enduser_z | 11/25/04
Not destroyed, exactly..  Patrick Jones | 11/25/04
Strawman  John L. Ries | 11/25/04
bitty's own medicine  AmusedAtItAll | 11/27/04
Article about patents, but pertains here, too  AbsolutelyNot | 11/26/04
Probably Erroneous.  ParadigmOdyssey | 11/28/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here