'Bush' spam does not stop

TalkBack 22 of 86:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

If you're so certain, digital dude, answer this for me then!

Why is the federal government still telling us that the twin towers were felled by fire when this is not scientifically possible? For the towers to have fallen the way the feds are describing, Galileo's Law of Falling Bodies would have had to be blatantly defied. Allow me to demonstrate:

The total distance traveled at the end of any specific time in a total vacuum is calculated by this formula:

Distance(d) = (32.16/2) x Time in Seconds Squared

If there is any resistance (such as the floors of the trade towers that were pancaked on to by the upper floors descending down upon them), then the speed and time of the falling body slows down in relation to the resistance. In the case of the WTC Towers 1 and 2, we know that the towers were 1350 feet tall, thus you would have this equation for the fastest time of total drop in a vacuum:

1350 = (32.16/2) x Time in Seconds Squared. This works out to 9.1627 seconds as the fatest time these buildings could come down. This presents some very interesting questions because WTC Tower 2 came down in 10.4 seconds and WTC Tower 1 came down in 8.1 seconds. Additionally, there was resistance, and plenty of it-- the resistance was the massive lower sections of the buildings that were stabilized by over 250 major interior and exterior steel columns, and thousands of steel trusses (not to mention all the office furniture, computers and such, and, sad to say, human bodies). THIS DEFIES THE LAWS OF GRAVITY!
Finally think about this: we all saw people jumping out of the trade towers. How long did it take them to reach the ground? 4,5, maybe 6 seconds? And these were bodies that were FREE FALLING (meaning of course ZERO resistance). Now compare this to the trade towers which fell in just a few seconds more time! But how is this possible that it fell almost as quickly given that there was hundreds of TONS in weight of resistance slowing down its descent????????????????
The ONLY way those towers could have fallen that quickly is if they themselves FREE FELL. And this would have ONLY been possible if the floors that were being pancaked on to were already thoroughly destroyed before the upper floors reached them. And THIS would have ONLY been possible if the floors were destroyed by high-powered explosives! Think about it: free falling human bodies fell in just about the same time that two 110 story steel framed buildings did...think about it...;-)
And it certainly makes the explosives theory much more probable after the admission by Larry Silverstein, owner of the trade center complex, that WTC 7 was taken down by explosives:

http://www.infowars.com/print/Sept11/FDNY.htm

Now you need to realize that refuting what I just put forth would be REWRITING SCIENTIFIC LAW. I am very curious as to what your response to this will be...;-)

Once again: 110 story steel framed buildings (with much of its structure still intact below the planes' point of impact) with hundreds of tons of pound in resistance slowing its fall..fell in just about the same time as human bodies free falling through the air facing zero resistance. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE???...

Posted by: Jeff Spicoli   Posted on: 11/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Email Security and Archiving - Clearer in the Cloud Google The time is NOW for businesses and organizations of all sizes to implement ... Download Now
• The Impact of Virtualization Software on Operating Environments VMware Today's use of virtualization technology allows IT professionals to ... Download Now
• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now