On MovieTome: New writers on 'Uncharted' the movie
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 26:
Next »
« Previous
Flawed argument
"If the Bells didn't exist, your internet provider could charge you anything they wanted for phone service" - Incorrect since competition does exist for alternate VoIP providers. Competition = good for the consumer.

"Imagine going to Target and buying an 'AOL' enhanced phone to get optimal reception in their proprietary format. Then wanting to switch for price only to find your phone doesn't work with 'Earthlink' formats" - While theoretically possible, this is not how VoIP works, and I believe that any company that tried to lock in consumers would receive a consumer backlash. Also, the biggest VoIP providers do not have internet services as their primary alternate business. It is however possible that you may buy a router with integrated VoIP that is dedicated to a single vendor, then you may encounter switchover problems. You could still get around this though by using the new provider's non-integrated phone adaptor in front of the router, or attempting to update the router's programming.

"Then, there is the problem of managing phone numbers. Imagine if your number on the AOL system is someone else's number of the Earthlink system" - Have you studied up on VoIP? This is not how it works. Anyone who tried a proprietary numbering scheme would quickly lose customers to the competitors who do not.

"some people just might not have good phone service. Without regulation, the Bells would die and those people out in the "boonies" would be required to use cell phones for all communication" - This one is valid, although you left out that some remote areas not only don't have broadband, they also lack cell phone service. Those consumers would just be SOL if the phone companies shut down operations. Although, I suspect the local governments would cobble together something, it likely would be mediocre at best.
Posted by: ac2_z   Posted on: 11/09/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

typical Republican  Joe Blow_z | 11/09/04
Why should it be regulated?  rapson | 11/09/04
Equal phones for everyone  agramont@... | 11/09/04
Flawed argument  ac2_z | 11/09/04
VOIP is Still Regulated.  Letophoro | 11/09/04
Uh huh ... yep ...  Judas I. | 11/09/04
Was it ever meant to protect consumers?  voska | 11/09/04
Nonsense  rapson | 11/09/04
Really?  Judas I. | 11/09/04
Antitrust and monopolies  Letophoro | 11/09/04
Of course  lengua99 | 11/10/04
So why don't the Bells just switch to Internet phones?  agramont@... | 11/09/04
Right, and instead ...  Judas I. | 11/09/04
I can internet access for less than I pay for phone service  voska | 11/09/04
I'm trying to figure out your numbers here.  Judas I. | 11/09/04
Costs  Letophoro | 11/09/04
I think you may be getting my point, L.  Judas I. | 11/10/04
FCC further deregulates Net calls  Loverock Davidson | 11/10/04
For the protection of the TRULY poor, ...  Judas I. | 11/10/04
I'd like to agree  Loverock Davidson | 11/10/04
I disagree  CreatureBoy | 11/12/04
The REAL issue is RELIABILITY  Stewart Cannon | 11/10/04
how often does your network fail  JasonL31 | 11/10/04
Translation...  John L. Ries | 11/10/04
Open the lines  matthew.r.bonestele@... | 01/06/05
It's never been "free"  mombo | 08/05/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline