On TechRepublic: 10 lame phrases to cut from your resume
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 41 of 76:
Next »
« Previous
And a good one
Actually, the decision pre-dated me, and we never got to the point where we had to make the tough decision. But there are several factors at work here.

One is cost. There is first the requirement to test any mod against every browser we support. This is not an option - final acceptance test is a must, nothing goes out the door without the door without it, and the more browsers support ed the higher the cost. There is also support cost. We have to retain expertise to meet any call or note to the webmaster.

There comes a time at which you have to declare an end. Sure 90% is purely arbitrary, but think about what it means. Common wisdom is that Windows commands 95% of the desktop. If IE hit 90% (other than in ZDnet articles and talkback), that would mean that the composite competition only hit 5%. Eventually competition would have reached the point of non-sustainability, and so we had settled on the 90% figure as a point to consider being one of the sites that dropped out, potentially further accelerating the decline.

On reflection, this is not writing off that much of the audience. If they have Windows they have IE, so they could switch. Some would not, but some would.

As I say, it's arbitrary, but there is a cut point somewhere. Fortunately we never had to face it.
Posted by: IT_User   Posted on: 11/02/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I am curious  Squawkbox | 11/01/04
Study: Firefox still gaining on Internet Explorer  Loverock Davidson | 11/01/04
A flash pan?  Linux User 147560 | 11/01/04
Load of crap, Mosaic still rulez  FilledOut | 11/02/04
If so...  htotten | 11/02/04
Here ya go..... Google IS your friend BTW  Squawkbox | 11/02/04
XP???  dennisling@... | 11/02/04
Yes... But OS 98 & 98SE  Freebro | 11/02/04
Heretic!!  Robert Crocker | 11/02/04
Charlotte!  wresnick | 11/03/04
back in the real world.....woah watch out for that flying pig  hipparchus2000 | 11/02/04
Security at last!  wresnick | 11/03/04
Seems to me that Microsoft...  voska | 11/02/04
Stand By  bitsbucket | 11/02/04
Small circles and large.  Anton Philidor | 11/02/04
What? A thoughtful analysis? Thanks.  Sunny Jalolly | 11/02/04
Re: Small circles and large  alterego_z | 11/02/04
Does following standards help or hurt?  Anton Philidor | 11/02/04
NOT TRUE  xshakes | 11/02/04
Re: Does following standards help or hurt?  alterego_z | 11/02/04
Largely irrelevant  IT_User | 11/02/04
Neverthess  John L. Ries | 11/02/04
Point for discussion, not an assertion of mine.  Anton Philidor | 11/02/04
How to respond?  IT_User | 11/02/04
You did assert, though,,,  John L. Ries | 11/02/04
"most users"  Anton Philidor | 11/03/04
Anton, John did not say 'most users'...  The King's Servant | 11/03/04
RE: Does following standards help or hurt?  RealAusTech | 11/02/04
Backasswards...You are....As always..at least from my POV.  LazLong | 11/02/04
Yahoo is a bad example.  Joel R | 11/03/04
An EXTREMELY impressive demonstration of the value of Web standards  Joel R | 11/03/04
Ah butt Anton..progress is still progress  Laff | 11/02/04
Look at the numbers  tic swayback | 11/02/04
Oddities in the numbers.  Anton Philidor | 11/02/04
Agreed  tic swayback | 11/02/04
Netscape  Arnohamel | 11/03/04
You don't say.....  Gosu | 11/02/04
How Firefox reaches the technically hopeless  Cat Ketch | 11/05/04
Wow such numbers!  IT_User | 11/02/04
Question  John L. Ries | 11/02/04
And a good one  IT_User | 11/02/04
Write to the standards, not for IE only.  spencerlmp | 11/02/04
Whoa, did you read the thread?  IT_User | 11/02/04
Thanks for the answer  John L. Ries | 11/02/04
Web Statistics or "The Emperor has no clothes"  tree_z | 11/02/04
Certainly one of the imponderables  IT_User | 11/03/04
See my "Yahoo is a bad example" post above...  Joel R | 11/04/04
Firefox  dennisling@... | 11/02/04
great browser  sawer | 11/02/04
A wonderful surprise  barb@... | 11/02/04
Firefox  Gosu | 11/02/04
That is really silly  LazLong | 11/02/04
Train 3000 people?  wetdog | 11/02/04
So I went to my COO (my immediate boss)  The King's Servant | 11/03/04
Firefox? Yes, but...  NukeSubs | 11/03/04
Yes, but what?  GuidoMuldoon | 11/03/04
Call and complain to you bank, worked for me  voska | 11/03/04
Then change and install IEView.  The King's Servant | 11/03/04
Better yet, install Launchy.  Joel R | 11/04/04
Unbelievable  derekgore | 11/03/04
Absolutely unbelievable...  The King's Servant | 11/03/04
Yes, the Mac is not immune.  Joel R | 11/04/04
COMAlite J  derekgore | 11/04/04
A history lesson  derekgore | 11/04/04
Poor post  derekgore | 11/04/04
About to give up on Firefox...  rdwhitti | 11/03/04
About to give up on Firefox... Why?  opensource@... | 11/03/04
Look at the Firefox forum on Mozilla.org  rdwhitti | 11/03/04
This is a good thing  DarthRidiculous | 11/03/04
Firefox  jonjon1946@... | 11/04/04
Firefox  jonjon1946@... | 11/04/04
firefox  jonjon1946@... | 11/04/04
firefox  droiddoc | 11/05/04
Some XML applications will nor work!  saul@... | 11/09/04
"Firefox is rubbish mate"  benso | 11/11/04
Apology re my earlier post  benso | 11/14/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here