On TV.com: LADY GAGA Photos
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 76:
Next »
« Previous
Neverthess
While I admit to having Windows on my work machine because I have to, and do have IE available to me when I'm working on that machine, it doesn't follow that I will automatically switch from Mozilla (IE has never been my default) to IE just because there is something that IE will let me access, but Mozilla won't. If it's really important for me to access that information, I'll do it (and then send a complaint to the webmaster), but otherwise, I'll just assume the site is broken and go elsewhere (and the webmaster will never hear about it). I think you will find that is is common behavior for non-IE users.

In practice, I've used IE to access something I couldn't get with Mozilla or Firefox (excluding Windows Update) exactly once in the last year.
Setting up a browser-specific website tells your potential viewers that use other browsers to go away; if you're running a commercial site, that's generally a bad idea, since these are potential customers; and if you're running a non-commercial site, why limit your audience? Furthermore, the fact that the vast majority of websites are now generic would indicate that creating a generic site is considerably easier than MS-fans like yourself allege.

So what does an IE-specific website buy you then, other than possibly some of Microsoft's goodwill?
Posted by: John L. Ries   Posted on: 11/02/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I am curious  Squawkbox | 11/01/04
Study: Firefox still gaining on Internet Explorer  Loverock Davidson | 11/01/04
A flash pan?  Linux User 147560 | 11/01/04
Load of crap, Mosaic still rulez  FilledOut | 11/02/04
If so...  htotten | 11/02/04
Here ya go..... Google IS your friend BTW  Squawkbox | 11/02/04
XP???  dennisling@... | 11/02/04
Yes... But OS 98 & 98SE  Freebro | 11/02/04
Heretic!!  Robert Crocker | 11/02/04
Charlotte!  wresnick | 11/03/04
back in the real world.....woah watch out for that flying pig  hipparchus2000 | 11/02/04
Security at last!  wresnick | 11/03/04
Seems to me that Microsoft...  voska | 11/02/04
Stand By  bitsbucket | 11/02/04
Small circles and large.  Anton Philidor | 11/02/04
What? A thoughtful analysis? Thanks.  Sunny Jalolly | 11/02/04
Re: Small circles and large  alterego_z | 11/02/04
Does following standards help or hurt?  Anton Philidor | 11/02/04
NOT TRUE  xshakes | 11/02/04
Re: Does following standards help or hurt?  alterego_z | 11/02/04
Largely irrelevant  IT_User | 11/02/04
Neverthess  John L. Ries | 11/02/04
Point for discussion, not an assertion of mine.  Anton Philidor | 11/02/04
How to respond?  IT_User | 11/02/04
You did assert, though,,,  John L. Ries | 11/02/04
"most users"  Anton Philidor | 11/03/04
Anton, John did not say 'most users'...  The King's Servant | 11/03/04
RE: Does following standards help or hurt?  RealAusTech | 11/02/04
Backasswards...You are....As always..at least from my POV.  LazLong | 11/02/04
Yahoo is a bad example.  Joel R | 11/03/04
An EXTREMELY impressive demonstration of the value of Web standards  Joel R | 11/03/04
Ah butt Anton..progress is still progress  Laff | 11/02/04
Look at the numbers  tic swayback | 11/02/04
Oddities in the numbers.  Anton Philidor | 11/02/04
Agreed  tic swayback | 11/02/04
Netscape  Arnohamel | 11/03/04
You don't say.....  Gosu | 11/02/04
How Firefox reaches the technically hopeless  Cat Ketch | 11/05/04
Wow such numbers!  IT_User | 11/02/04
Question  John L. Ries | 11/02/04
And a good one  IT_User | 11/02/04
Write to the standards, not for IE only.  spencerlmp | 11/02/04
Whoa, did you read the thread?  IT_User | 11/02/04
Thanks for the answer  John L. Ries | 11/02/04
Web Statistics or "The Emperor has no clothes"  tree_z | 11/02/04
Certainly one of the imponderables  IT_User | 11/03/04
See my "Yahoo is a bad example" post above...  Joel R | 11/04/04
Firefox  dennisling@... | 11/02/04
great browser  sawer | 11/02/04
A wonderful surprise  barb@... | 11/02/04
Firefox  Gosu | 11/02/04
That is really silly  LazLong | 11/02/04
Train 3000 people?  wetdog | 11/02/04
So I went to my COO (my immediate boss)  The King's Servant | 11/03/04
Firefox? Yes, but...  NukeSubs | 11/03/04
Yes, but what?  GuidoMuldoon | 11/03/04
Call and complain to you bank, worked for me  voska | 11/03/04
Then change and install IEView.  The King's Servant | 11/03/04
Better yet, install Launchy.  Joel R | 11/04/04
Unbelievable  derekgore | 11/03/04
Absolutely unbelievable...  The King's Servant | 11/03/04
Yes, the Mac is not immune.  Joel R | 11/04/04
COMAlite J  derekgore | 11/04/04
A history lesson  derekgore | 11/04/04
Poor post  derekgore | 11/04/04
About to give up on Firefox...  rdwhitti | 11/03/04
About to give up on Firefox... Why?  opensource@... | 11/03/04
Look at the Firefox forum on Mozilla.org  rdwhitti | 11/03/04
This is a good thing  DarthRidiculous | 11/03/04
Firefox  jonjon1946@... | 11/04/04
Firefox  jonjon1946@... | 11/04/04
firefox  jonjon1946@... | 11/04/04
firefox  droiddoc | 11/05/04
Some XML applications will nor work!  saul@... | 11/09/04
"Firefox is rubbish mate"  benso | 11/11/04
Apology re my earlier post  benso | 11/14/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc