On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 15 of 20:
Next »
« Previous
Adobe v. Softman judicial opinion
Here is the PDF for the Adobe v. Softman case. While the case did not go into the enforceability of specific terms of EULAs, it did state that software is sold and not licensed. This in itself is very significant, since contract terms mean little when you own the product.

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5628

[This is not a direct link to the opinion, but the opinion is accessible from here]

Cheers!
Posted by: Root User   Posted on: 10/12/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It figures...  Kamikaze_Ohka | 10/09/04
So true...  doe_z | 10/10/04
The problem is..  d_jedi | 10/12/04
what bull  V Sanders | 10/09/04
Last time I checked..  d_jedi | 10/12/04
May backfire on Blizzard  FilledOut | 10/11/04
Let's face it. We're doomed...  BitTwiddler | 10/11/04
Good for Blizzard  DigitalKid | 10/11/04
This one has a good chance of being overturned...  Root User | 10/11/04
Do you even play games or use BattleNet?  DigitalKid | 10/12/04
Yes, I have personally played games on BattleNet  Root User | 10/12/04
You are incorrect  d_jedi | 10/12/04
Sadly, click-through licenses were upheld.  JonathonDoe | 10/12/04
This actually hasn't been tested yet  voska | 10/12/04
Adobe v. Softman judicial opinion  Root User | 10/12/04
Sold, rather than licensed, makes a BIG difference.  JonathonDoe | 10/13/04
True but I have issues with what is being enforced  The King's Servant | 10/11/04
they sold the game  V Sanders | 10/11/04
Well yep, I agree with you there...  DigitalKid | 10/12/04
.. but the problem is those who DIDN'T purchase the game..  d_jedi | 10/12/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement