On BNET: 5 classic computer pranks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 8:
Next »
« Previous
Nice reporting
ZDNet really has something against using facts in articles.

So, this article simply states that users can sue. And then states the bill lacks teeth.

I guess it would be insane to list what the provisions of the bill actually are, what type of penalties can be enacted, what if any criminal prosecution or fines can be levied. Not even a link to this information.

I guess ZDNet just determined that I should think the bill is weak because some guy is quoted as saying so. That's all the facts you need.
Posted by: ibabadur1   Posted on: 09/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Nice try.  Roger Ramjet | 09/29/04
It's a start...  Jomo_z | 09/29/04
your right  V Sanders | 09/29/04
Well  Suicida| | 09/29/04
Yeah, I know the WORST one  Roger Ramjet | 09/29/04
Critics of the bill said it lacked teeth.  RobertoSalazar | 09/29/04
Nice reporting  ibabadur1 | 09/29/04
Big problem: "Consent" by EULAs  Root User | 09/29/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement