On mySimon: Rite-Lite Super Bright LED Puck Lights
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 53:
Next »
« Previous
Nothing has changed, pirating occured and still occurs 50 years later
Before P2P people traded music via FTP, News groups, and IRC. You couldn't search these like you can with P2P so finding new interesting music was difficult. You were left with finding what you heard through promotion which is controled by the RIAA members that being radio, awards show, and music videos.

Before the Internet people burned CD of music and trade them but once again the impact of new independent music was limited and not a threat to the RIAA members.

Before CD burners it was cassette tapes and the same thing little impact in terms of new independent music though the grunge era started this way.

Before cassette tapes it real to real recordings and that too had little impact from independent artists.

The big differnce today with P2P is not the ease of swapping files but the fact the technology to record a quality recording is considerably less costly for an artist and they can flood P2P with thier tunes.

Now the question you have to ask is why wasn't copyright infringement a problem with real to real tape recorders, cassette tape recorders, CD burners, and common internet protocols? The music industry seemed to actually thrive in this underground distribution of copyright material. Only when the threat of independent artist bypassing them showed up did the RIAA freak out.

It's not P2P it's the fact that for $500 you can turn you PC, assuming you already have one, into a recording studio. For $20,000 you can have professional setup. What used to cost prohibitive for artist happened come down to more realistic prices at the same time that Napster came out. That's the problem.

I'm not arguing that copyright infringement not illegal just saying it's always happen and it will continue. Business as usual and in 10 year there won't be any middle men. In the mean time we as consumers get attacked and stupid laws are being passed.
Posted by: voska   Posted on: 08/24/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

With those loopholes it's useless.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/24/04
All the laws are useless  voska | 08/24/04
I don't follow what your saying.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/24/04
that too,  tamuhockey | 08/24/04
Radio station are paid to play music  voska | 08/24/04
Yes but..  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
Not really an insult  rapson | 08/25/04
That's because you choose not to see  voska | 08/24/04
actually, you are BOTH wrong...  ryusen | 08/24/04
That's pretty much exactly what I said  voska | 08/24/04
ANY monopolists are afraid of the internet..  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
my aplogies...  ryusen | 08/24/04
NP(NT)  voska | 08/24/04
Threading...  nomorems | 08/25/04
All childishness aside,  James Dean_z | 08/24/04
He's looking at the big picture, you're looking at the details  tic swayback | 08/24/04
The problem exists, alright  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
The problem withyour analysis  Letophoro | 08/24/04
The Napster case is fair warning.  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
I'm not sanguine about it.  Letophoro | 08/24/04
Unintended consequences  tic swayback | 08/24/04
Nothing has changed, pirating occured and still occurs 50 years later  voska | 08/24/04
Well...  tic swayback | 08/24/04
I remember the time  voska | 08/24/04
Where are the loopholes?  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
Who's the naive country boy?  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Um no  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
Corrections  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Need a reason called profit  voska | 08/24/04
Yes, and...  rapson | 08/25/04
Napster provided a new business model  voska | 08/24/04
Fewer loopholes than the original  tic swayback | 08/24/04
So true  voska | 08/24/04
Legislation as a statement of principle  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Perfect Election year law  jfp | 08/24/04
Copy machines?  RicD_ | 08/24/04
And you won't  tamuhockey | 08/24/04
He read it.  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
He didn't read it  tamuhockey | 08/24/04
Yeah, right.  tic swayback | 08/24/04
Encourage friends, discourasge opponents  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Chicken or egg  tic swayback | 08/24/04
Agreeing to differ; I think he means it.  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
He knows  AbsolutelyNot | 08/24/04
Why Xerox and Apple wont really be affected...  ryusen | 08/24/04
They will be affected  tic swayback | 08/24/04
look at my reasons...  ryusen | 08/24/04
sides:  ryusen | 08/24/04
Please PASS the INDUCE Act!!!  Lloyd_17 | 08/24/04
great opportunity for developers in other countries  cybershoplifter | 08/25/04
Here's how to make a difference  Luke123 | 08/25/04
I Dont Know  ParadigmOdyssey | 08/25/04
Induce Act will make DMCA illegal  jayk_z | 08/26/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More