On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 53:
Next »
« Previous
Radio station are paid to play music
The Royalty thing is just there to make it look like they are following regulation reguarding payola. In reality Major Recording Label pay millions of dollars to Independent Record Promoters (IRP) who then pay radio station to put specified song on to station play lists. This why you can listen to a dozen differnt radio stations and hear nothing but the same music. P2P will kill radio. Advertising while bringing in a hefty sum is not enough to keep radio station going if they lose the money from IRPs as with out that money they are still paying royalties. This the main reason internet radio went under.
Posted by: voska   Posted on: 08/24/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

With those loopholes it's useless.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/24/04
All the laws are useless  voska | 08/24/04
I don't follow what your saying.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/24/04
that too,  tamuhockey | 08/24/04
Radio station are paid to play music  voska | 08/24/04
Yes but..  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
Not really an insult  rapson | 08/25/04
That's because you choose not to see  voska | 08/24/04
actually, you are BOTH wrong...  ryusen | 08/24/04
That's pretty much exactly what I said  voska | 08/24/04
ANY monopolists are afraid of the internet..  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
my aplogies...  ryusen | 08/24/04
NP(NT)  voska | 08/24/04
Threading...  nomorems | 08/25/04
All childishness aside,  James Dean_z | 08/24/04
He's looking at the big picture, you're looking at the details  tic swayback | 08/24/04
The problem exists, alright  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
The problem withyour analysis  Letophoro | 08/24/04
The Napster case is fair warning.  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
I'm not sanguine about it.  Letophoro | 08/24/04
Unintended consequences  tic swayback | 08/24/04
Nothing has changed, pirating occured and still occurs 50 years later  voska | 08/24/04
Well...  tic swayback | 08/24/04
I remember the time  voska | 08/24/04
Where are the loopholes?  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
Who's the naive country boy?  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Um no  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
Corrections  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Need a reason called profit  voska | 08/24/04
Yes, and...  rapson | 08/25/04
Napster provided a new business model  voska | 08/24/04
Fewer loopholes than the original  tic swayback | 08/24/04
So true  voska | 08/24/04
Legislation as a statement of principle  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Perfect Election year law  jfp | 08/24/04
Copy machines?  RicD_ | 08/24/04
And you won't  tamuhockey | 08/24/04
He read it.  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
He didn't read it  tamuhockey | 08/24/04
Yeah, right.  tic swayback | 08/24/04
Encourage friends, discourasge opponents  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Chicken or egg  tic swayback | 08/24/04
Agreeing to differ; I think he means it.  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
He knows  AbsolutelyNot | 08/24/04
Why Xerox and Apple wont really be affected...  ryusen | 08/24/04
They will be affected  tic swayback | 08/24/04
look at my reasons...  ryusen | 08/24/04
sides:  ryusen | 08/24/04
Please PASS the INDUCE Act!!!  Lloyd_17 | 08/24/04
great opportunity for developers in other countries  cybershoplifter | 08/25/04
Here's how to make a difference  Luke123 | 08/25/04
I Dont Know  ParadigmOdyssey | 08/25/04
Induce Act will make DMCA illegal  jayk_z | 08/26/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here