On CBS.com: You a Race Fan?Play Amazing Race Fantasy
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 53:
Next »
« Previous
The problem exists, alright
You're wrong when you said the content companies and their minions in Congress want to "fix [a] problem that does not exist". It's not just about "the public might hear music that [content companies] don't control".

There are people obtaining copyrighted works without paying for them, against the wishes of the copyright holder. That's illegal.

The issue is what happens next. The first, best possibility is that companies adapt to the new circumstances by making use of the internet as a distribution mechanism. They don't charge excessively and they make large catalogues available quickly and easily.

Apple et al have shown how well that can work.

There'd be more competition, more sales, weaker p2p networks if the content companies were interested in selling over the internet. Instead, they created sales sites intended to fail and licensed their catalogues to real sellers at rates that prevent profits. Because sellers have been so successful, I think it possible the content executives will try to end their licensing agreements.

But, if it works, some very popular singles and out of print stuff will be traded on p2p, but the industry can keep and in fact grow their business whenever they choose.


Instead, the content companies, having failed to stop p2p by their own efforts, have run to the government for help. We have the unseemly picture of Congresspersons testing out ideas about how best to torment a substantial portion of the population.
Watching a national government get deputized by commercial interests so baldly is a national embarassment.


Anyway, the content industry has always objected to the new technologies that made their fortunes. Eventually, enough executives will get thrown out on their... ears that the group coming to the top will use the internet and produce record profits.
We, as citizens, just have to suffer in the interim.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 08/24/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

With those loopholes it's useless.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/24/04
All the laws are useless  voska | 08/24/04
I don't follow what your saying.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/24/04
that too,  tamuhockey | 08/24/04
Radio station are paid to play music  voska | 08/24/04
Yes but..  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
Not really an insult  rapson | 08/25/04
That's because you choose not to see  voska | 08/24/04
actually, you are BOTH wrong...  ryusen | 08/24/04
That's pretty much exactly what I said  voska | 08/24/04
ANY monopolists are afraid of the internet..  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
my aplogies...  ryusen | 08/24/04
NP(NT)  voska | 08/24/04
Threading...  nomorems | 08/25/04
All childishness aside,  James Dean_z | 08/24/04
He's looking at the big picture, you're looking at the details  tic swayback | 08/24/04
The problem exists, alright  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
The problem withyour analysis  Letophoro | 08/24/04
The Napster case is fair warning.  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
I'm not sanguine about it.  Letophoro | 08/24/04
Unintended consequences  tic swayback | 08/24/04
Nothing has changed, pirating occured and still occurs 50 years later  voska | 08/24/04
Well...  tic swayback | 08/24/04
I remember the time  voska | 08/24/04
Where are the loopholes?  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
Who's the naive country boy?  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Um no  Jeff Spicoli | 08/24/04
Corrections  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Need a reason called profit  voska | 08/24/04
Yes, and...  rapson | 08/25/04
Napster provided a new business model  voska | 08/24/04
Fewer loopholes than the original  tic swayback | 08/24/04
So true  voska | 08/24/04
Legislation as a statement of principle  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Perfect Election year law  jfp | 08/24/04
Copy machines?  RicD_ | 08/24/04
And you won't  tamuhockey | 08/24/04
He read it.  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
He didn't read it  tamuhockey | 08/24/04
Yeah, right.  tic swayback | 08/24/04
Encourage friends, discourasge opponents  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
Chicken or egg  tic swayback | 08/24/04
Agreeing to differ; I think he means it.  Anton Philidor | 08/24/04
He knows  AbsolutelyNot | 08/24/04
Why Xerox and Apple wont really be affected...  ryusen | 08/24/04
They will be affected  tic swayback | 08/24/04
look at my reasons...  ryusen | 08/24/04
sides:  ryusen | 08/24/04
Please PASS the INDUCE Act!!!  Lloyd_17 | 08/24/04
great opportunity for developers in other countries  cybershoplifter | 08/25/04
Here's how to make a difference  Luke123 | 08/25/04
I Dont Know  ParadigmOdyssey | 08/25/04
Induce Act will make DMCA illegal  jayk_z | 08/26/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and